The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Guidelines for perioperative care in gynecologic/oncology: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations—2019 update
Open accessAbstract
Background This is the first updated Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society guideline presenting a consensus for optimal perioperative care in gynecologic/oncology surgery. Methods A database search of publications using Embase and PubMed was performed. Studies on each item within the ERAS gynecologic/oncology protocol were selected with emphasis on meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and large prospective cohort studies. These studies were then reviewed and graded according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Results All recommendations on ERAS protocol items are based on best available evidence. The level of evidence for each item is presented accordingly. Conclusions The updated evidence base and recommendation for items within the ERAS gynecologic/oncology perioperative care pathway are presented by the ERAS® Society in this consensus review.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G. E., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Alonso-Coello, P., & Schünemann, H. J. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.ad · Cited by 23,305
McClave, S. A., Taylor, B. E., Martindale, R. G., Warren, M. M., Johnson, D. R., Braunschweig, C., McCarthy, M. S., Davanos, E., Rice, T. W., Cresci, G. A., et al. (2016) · Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · doi:10.1177/0148607115621863 · Cited by 3,982
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, & U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health (2006) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/1477-7525-4-79 · Cited by 2,856
New Persistent Opioid Use After Minor and Major Surgical Procedures in US Adults
Brummett, C. M., Waljee, J. F., Goesling, J., Moser, S., Lin, P., Englesbe, M. J., Bohnert, A. S. B., Kheterpal, S., & Nallamothu, B. K. (2017) · JAMA Surgery · doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0504 · Cited by 2,025
A trial of intraoperative low-tidal-volume ventilation in abdominal surgery
Futier, E., Constantin, J.-M., Paugam-Burtz, C., Pascal, J., Eurin, M., Neuschwander, A., Marret, E., Beaussier, M., Gutton, C., Lefrant, J.-Y., et al. (2013) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1301082 · Cited by 1,434
The economic burden of prescription opioid overdose, abuse and dependence in the United States, 2013
Florence, C. S., Zhou, C., Luo, F., & Xu, L. (2016) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/mlr.0000000000000625 · Cited by 1,152
Preoperative fasting for adults to prevent perioperative complications
Brady, M. C., Kinn, S., Stuart, P., & Ness, V. (2003) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004423 · Cited by 694
Powell, R., Scott, N. W., Manyande, A., Bruce, J., Vögele, C., Byrne-Davis, L. M., Unsworth, M., Osmer, C., & Johnston, M. (2016) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd008646.pub2 · Cited by 369
Cited by
Bollag, L., Lim, G., Sultan, P., Habib, A. S., Landau, R., Zakowski, M., Tiouririne, M., Bhambhani, S., & Carvalho, B. (2021) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1213/ane.0000000000005257 · Cited by 378
Brindle, M., Nelson, G., Lobo, D. N., Ljungqvist, O., & Gustafsson, U. O. (2020) · BJS Open · doi:10.1002/bjs5.50238 · Cited by 181
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Nelson, G., Bakkum-Gamez, J., Kalogera, E., Glaser, G., Altman, A., Meyer, L. A., Taylor, J. S., Iniesta, M., Lasala, J., Mena, G., Scott, M., Gillis, C., Elias, K., Wijk, L., Huang, J., Nygren, J., Ljungqvist, O., Ramirez, P. T., & Dowdy, S. C.
- Venue
- International Journal of Gynecological Cancer
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-05
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 651-668
- ISSN
- 1048-891X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2921529689
- Cited by
- 758
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 80.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
