Cited by 12Trauma and Emergency Care StudiesSpinal Cord Injury ResearchSpinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques

Should suspected cervical spinal cord injuries be immobilised? A systematic review protocol

Oteir, Ala'a O, Jennings, Paul A, Smith, Karen, Stoelwinder, Johannes·2014·Injury Prevention

Abstract

Background: Cervical spinal cord injuries may result in life-threatening situations and long-term disability. Prehospital spinal immobilisation is the standard of care for patients with potential spinal cord injury (SCI). It aims to prepare patients for transport, achieve neutral spinal alignment, and reduce movement and secondary injuries in potentially unstable spines. However, there is a lack of evidence on its clinical benefits and its overall effect on patient outcomes. Objectives: To identify the reported outcomes following immobilisation of suspected cervical SCI, to compare the effects of spinal immobilisation versus no immobilisation on the reported outcomes, and to provide recommendations for prehospital cervical immobilisation. Design/methods: A search of the literature will be conducted using relevant online databases. This will include all types of human studies that were published in English from the earliest record available to the first week of October 2013. One author will conduct the search and two independent authors will screen the titles and the abstracts identified by the search and critically appraise the selected papers. A third author will be available to resolve any disagreement. The findings will be reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) guidelines. Critical appraisal as well as the level and the strength of evidence will follow the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) guidelines. Discussion: Evidence-based practices should be pursued to further improve the prehospital care for suspected cervical SCI. This systematic review will contribute to the body of knowledge regarding the spinal immobilisation effects on the SCI patient's outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/injuryprev-2013-041080

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is very limited published evidence to support the notion that cervical spine collars and immobilization prevent secondary spinal cord injury.

    “there is very limited published evidence to support the notion that cervical spine collars and immobilization prevent secondary spinal cord injury.28,29”

    From Airway Management in Trauma (2018) · cites this paper as [29]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oteir, A. O., Jennings, P. A., Smith, K., & Stoelwinder, J.
Affiliations
  • Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • Ambulance Victoria (AU)
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
  • Monash University (AU)
Venue
Injury Prevention
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2013-12-09
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
e5-e5
ISSN
  • 1353-8047 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-5785
OpenAlex
W2043491455
Cited by
12
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Injury Prevention (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spinal Cord Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Keywords
cervical spinal cord injury, spinal immobilization, prehospital care, emergency medical services, patient outcomes, spinal injuries, secondary injury, spinal alignment
MeSH terms
Systematic Reviews as Topic, Decision Making, Humans, Immobilization, Prognosis, Quality of Life, Spinal Cord Injuries, Spinal Fusion, Time Factors, Evidence-Based Emergency Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review