Cost of illness studies: What is good about them?
Open accessAbstract
Cost of illness studies: what is good about
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
While estimating the cost of cancer treatment, both the health system cost as well as OOP expenditure was estimated following standard methodologies and based on data collected from one of the largest tertiary care public sector hospital located in India.
“While estimating the cost of cancer treatment, both the health system cost as well as OOP expenditure was estimated following standard methodologies [37, 40, 50] and based on data collected from one of the largest tertiary care public sector hospital located in India.”
From Cost effectiveness of strategies for cervical cancer prevention in India (2020) · cites this paper as [50]
In “Dorothy P Rice” (page unavailable), Rice describes cost-of-illness methods that separate direct costs and disaggregate medical costs by source of payment. This supports the general methodological citation, but the paper does not specify a method for jointly estimating health-system costs and out-of-pocket expenditure for cancer treatment. The hospital data are the citing authors’ own description, not a claim attributed to Rice. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Hodgson TA, Meiners M. Cost-of-injury methodology: a guide to current practices and procedures. Milbank Memo- rial Fund Quarterly 1982;60:429-62.
- Englander F, Hodgson TJ, Terragrossa RA. Economic dimensions of slip and fall injuries. J Forensic Sci 1996;41: 733-46.
- Maiek M, Chang B, Guyer B. The cost of medical care for injuries to children. Ann Emerg Med 1991;20:997-1045.
- Schnitzer PG, Runyan CW. Injuries to women in the United States: an overview. Women & Health 1995;23:9-27.
- Pletschen ZB, Schenert D, Mattern B, et al. Development of new injury cost scale. Accid Anal Prev 1993;25:675-87.
- Bonnie RJ, Fulco CE, Liverman CT, eds. Reducing the burden of injury prevention and treatment. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press, 1999.
- Committee on the NIH Research Priority-Setting Process. Scientific opportunities and public needs: improving priority- setting and public input at the National Institutes of Health. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press, 1998.
- Rice DP. Cost-of-illness studies: fact or fiction? Lancet 1994;344:1519-21.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cost-of-illness studies: concepts, scopes, and methods
Jo, C. (2014) · Clinical and Molecular Hepatology · doi:10.3350/cmh.2014.20.4.327 · Cited by 800 · see citing works
Cost of falls in old age: a systematic review
Heinrich, S., Rapp, K., Rissmann, U., Becker, C., & König, H.-H. (2010) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s00198-009-1100-1 · Cited by 573 · see citing works
A Systematic Review of Cost-of-Illness Studies of Multimorbidity
Wang, L., Si, L., Cocker, F., Palmer, A. J., & Sanderson, K. (2018) · Applied Health Economics and Health Policy · doi:10.1007/s40258-017-0346-6 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
The societal cost of depression: Evidence from 10,000 Swedish patients in psychiatric care
Ekman, M., Granström, O., Omérov, S., Jacob, J., & Landén, M. (2013) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2013.03.003 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Cost effectiveness of strategies for cervical cancer prevention in India
Chauhan, A. S., Prinja, S., Srinivasan, R., Rai, B., Malliga, J., Jyani, G., Gupta, N., & Ghoshal, S. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0238291 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
“While estimating the cost of cancer treatment, both the health system cost as well as OOP expenditure was estimated following standard methodologies [37, 40, 50] and based on data collected from one of the largest tertiary care public sector hospital located in India.”
Method
- Authors
- Rice, D. P.
- Affiliations
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rice, Dorothy P
- Venue
- Injury Prevention
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2000-09
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 177-179
- ISSN
- 1353-8047 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-5785
- PMC
- PMC1730654
- OpenAlex
- W2076326097
- Cited by
- 349
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 5.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Injury Prevention (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
- Keywords
- economic burden, economic burden of injury, health economics
- MeSH terms
- Data Interpretation, Statistical, Health Priorities, Health Services Research, Humans, Population Surveillance, United States, Wounds and Injuries, Reproducibility of Results, Health Care Rationing, Cost of Illness, Guidelines as Topic, Needs Assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
