Cited by 125Medical Coding and Health InformationInjury Epidemiology and PreventionTrauma and Emergency Care Studies

Accuracy of external cause of injury codes reported in Washington State hospital discharge records.

Open access
LeMier, M, Cummings, P, West, T A·2001·Injury Prevention

Abstract

Objective—To evaluate the accuracy of external cause of injury codes (E codes) reported in computerized hospital discharge records. Methods—All civilian hospitals in Washington State submit computerized data for each hospital discharge to a file maintained by the Department of Health. In 1996, 32 hospitals accounted for 80% of the injury related discharges in this file; from these hospitals, we sampled 1260 computerized records for injured patients in a stratified, but random, manner. An expert coder then visited the 32 study hospitals, reviewed the medical records that corresponded to each computerized record, and assigned an E code for that hospitalization. The computerized E code information was compared with codes provided by the expert reviewer. Results—The incidence of hospitalization for injury based upon computerized hospital discharge data was very similar to that based upon chart review: incidence rate ratio 1.0 (95% confidence interval 1.00 to 1.02). Computerized hospital discharge data correctly ranked injuries in regard to both mechanism and intent. Overall agreement on coding was 87% for mechanism of injury, 95% for intent of injury, and 66% for the complete E code. The sensitivity of computerized hospital discharge data for identification of falls, motor vehicle traffic injuries, poisonings, and firearm injuries was 91% or better. The predictive value positive of coding for these four categories of injury ranged from 88% for motor vehicle traffic injuries to 94% for poisonings. The amount of agreement for intent coding ranged from 84% for firearm injuries to 99% for falls. Agreement on coding of the complete E code ranged from 57% for firearm injuries to 72% for poisonings. Conclusions—Computerized hospital discharge data can be used with confidence to determine how many injuries are treated in a hospital setting and the relative magnitude of various categories of injury. E codes reported in hospital discharge data are a reliable source of information on the mechanism and intent of injury, the two types of information most often used for injury related analyses and priority setting. The detail codes (complete E codes) reported in hospital discharge codes are less reliable and must be used with caution.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/ip.7.4.334

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
LeMier, M., Cummings, P., & West, T. A.
Affiliations
  • Washington State Department of Health (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
LeMier, M
Venue
Injury Prevention
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2001-12
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
334-338
ISSN
  • 1353-8047 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-5785
OpenAlex
W2039808631
Cited by
125
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
FWCI
6.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Injury Prevention (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Washington State University
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (R49 CCR002570)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
Keywords
E-codes, hospital discharge data, coding accuracy, injury surveillance, falls, poisoning, firearm injuries, injury mechanisms, Washington State
MeSH terms
Forms and Records Control, Hospitalization, Humans, Medical Records Department, Hospital, Patient Discharge, Quality Control, Washington, Wounds and Injuries, Incidence, Medical Records Systems, Computerized

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review