The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Occupational injury prevention research: progress and priorities
Abstract
The twentieth century witnessed remarkable reductions in the number and rate of occupational fatalities and injuries. However, many preventable injuries and deaths still occur. Barriers to progress in occupational injury prevention are discussed, along with strategies for overcoming them. In mining, the frequency of death has dramatically declined over the century. The latest figures from the BLS indicate that less than 6000 worker deaths from injury occurred in 2000. Catastrophic events have prompted increased attention, resources, and action on workplace hazards and risks, resulting in sweeping changes, including new protective laws. Science based approaches to prevention have contributed to progress. Multidisciplinary collaboration among injury prevention researchers, and collaboration and cooperation among multiple sectors, have improved the relevance and application of injury prevention research and development. Barriers to further progress include lack of evaluation of the effectiveness of prevention strategies and technologies, including cost effectiveness; lack of widespread implementation of known, effective prevention; and lack of efficient transfer and implementation of prevention knowledge and products to the workplace. Evaluation and implementation of prevention efforts are most successfully achieved in partnership between researchers and the industry at risk, which requires outreach efforts on the part of the occupational research community.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Safety-first training works to reduce unwanted or unplanned injuries, illnesses and fatalities in high-risk industries.
“We know safety-first training works to reduce unwanted or unplanned injuries, illnesses and fatalities in ‘high-risk’ industries [157,158,159].”
From What People Really Think About Safety around Horses: The Relationship between Risk Perception, Values and Safety Behaviours (2020) · cites this paper as [159]
The opening discussion lists training programs among measures intended to reduce workplace falls, and the Conclusions report reductions in occupational injuries and deaths. But the paper does not establish that training itself caused those reductions or reduced illnesses. Its Barriers and Strategies section cautions that few prevention programs have been fully evaluated for effectiveness. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- 1999, MMWR, 48, 461
- National Research Council. Toward safer underground coal mines. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. 1982:52â5.
- Stein L. The triangle fire. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2001.
- Kaminetzky D. Design and construction failures: lessons from forensic investigations. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1991:78â85,167â70.
- Gregory CE. A concise history of mining. New York, NY: Pergamon Press, 1980:185.
- 1949, Am J Public Health, 39, 504, 10.2105/AJPH.39.4.504 · DOI
- 10.1136/ip.7.suppl_1.i11 · DOI
- Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations, 4th edn. New York, NY: The Free Press, 1995:5â12.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chapman, M., Thomas, M., & Thompson, K. (2020) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani10122222 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Stout, N. A., & Linn, H. I.
- Venue
- Injury Prevention
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2002-12
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- suppl 4
- Pages
- iv9-iv14
- ISSN
- 1353-8047
- 1475-5785
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review