Cited by 56Web Applications and Data ManagementElectronic Health Records SystemsEngineering and Information Technology

WebEAV: automatic metadata-driven generation of web interfaces to entity-attribute-value databases

Open access
Nadkarni, P. M., Brandt, C. M., Marenco, L.·2000·Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Abstract

The task of creating and maintaining a front end to a large institutional entity-attribute-value (EAV) database can be cumbersome when using traditional client-server technology. Switching to Web technology as a delivery vehicle solves some of these problems but introduces others. In particular, Web development environments tend to be primitive, and many features that client-server developers take for granted are missing. WebEAV is a generic framework for Web development that is intended to streamline the process of Web application development for databases having a significant EAV component. It also addresses some challenging user interface issues that arise when any complex system is created. The authors describe the architecture of WebEAV and provide an overview of its features with suitable examples.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jamia.2000.0070343

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [14]Darwin IF. Checking C Programs with Lint. Sebastopol, Calif: O'Reilly Associates, 1988.
  2. [17]Graham IS. HTML 4.0 Sourcebook. New York: Wiley Computer Publishing, 1997.
  3. [21]Boumphrey F, Di Renzo O, Duckett J, et al. XML Applications. London, UK: WROX Press, 1998.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nadkarni, P. M., Brandt, C. M., & Marenco, L.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Nadkarni, P. M.
Venue
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Published
2000-07-01
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
343-356
ISSN
  • 1067-5027 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-974X
OpenAlex
W2411784622
Cited by
56
References
14
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
14.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (U01CA078266, U01CA78266)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web Applications and Data Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Engineering and Information Technology
Keywords
web application framework, institutional databases, web frontend, user interface design, database front-end
MeSH terms
Software, User-Computer Interface, Databases as Topic, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review