The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Methods for the Design and Administration of Web-based Surveys
Open accessAbstract
This paper describes the design, development, and administration of a Web-based survey to determine the use of the Internet in clinical practice by 450 dental professionals. The survey blended principles of a controlled mail survey with data collection through a Web-based database application. The survey was implemented as a series of simple HTML pages and tested with a wide variety of operating environments. The response rate was 74.2 percent. Eighty-four percent of the participants completed the Web-based survey, and 16 percent used e-mail or fax. Problems identified during survey administration included incompatibilities/technical problems, usability problems, and a programming error. The cost of the Web-based survey was 38 percent less than that of an equivalent mail survey. A general formula for calculating breakeven points between electronic and hardcopy surveys is presented. Web-based surveys can significantly reduce turnaround time and cost compared with mail surveys and may enhance survey item completion rates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Using the Internet for Surveys and Health Research
Eysenbach, G., & Wyatt, J. (2002) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.4.2.e13 · Cited by 790
Cook, D. A., Wittich, C. M., Daniels, W. L., West, C. P., Harris, A. M., & Beebe, T. J. (2016) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.6318 · Cited by 203
Information seeking behavior of academic scientists
Hemminger, B. M., Lu, D., Vaughan, K. T. L., & Adams, S. J. (2007) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20686 · Cited by 169
Survey Methods to Optimize Response Rate in the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network
Funkhouser, E., Vellala, K., Baltuck, C., Cacciato, R., Durand, E., McEdward, D., Sowell, E., Theisen, S. E., Gilbert, G. H., & National Dental PBRN Collaborative Group (2017) · Evaluation & the Health Professions · doi:10.1177/0163278715625738 · Cited by 82
Paradata: A New Data Source From Web-Administered Measures
SOWAN, A. K., & JENKINS, L. S. (2010) · CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing · doi:10.1097/ncn.0b013e3181f698fd · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Schleyer, T. K. L., & Forrest, J. L.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-07-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 416-425
- ISSN
- 1067-5027 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-974X
- OpenAlex
- W1584034077
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 36.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Methods for the Design and Administration of Web-based Surveys. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/jamia.2000.0070416
- The paper
- Schleyer, T. K. L., & Forrest, J. L. (2000). Methods for the Design and Administration of Web-based Surveys. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. https://doi.org/10.1136/jamia.2000.0070416
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.