Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 167

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Columbia University's Informatics for Diabetes Education and Telemedicine (IDEATel) Project: Rationale and Design

Shea, S., Starren, J., Weinstock, R. S., Knudson, P. E., Teresi, J., Holmes, D., Palmas, W., Field, L., Goland, R., Tuck, C., Hripcsak, G., Capps, L., Liss, D.·2002·Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Abstract

The Columbia University Informatics for Diabetes Education and Telemedicine (IDEATel) Project is a four-year demonstration project funded by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services with the overall goals of evaluating the feasibility, acceptability, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of telemedicine in the management of older patients with diabetes. The study is designed as a randomized controlled trial and is being conducted by a state-wide consortium in New York. Eligibility requires that participants have diabetes, are Medicare beneficiaries, and reside in federally designated medically underserved areas. A total of 1,500 participants will be randomized, half in New York City and half in other areas of the state. Intervention participants receive a home telemedicine unit that provides synchronous videoconferencing with a project-based nurse, electronic transmission of home fingerstick glucose and blood pressure data, and Web access to a project Web site. End points include glycosylated hemoglobin, blood pressure, and lipid levels; patient satisfaction; health care service utilization; and costs. The project is intended to provide data to help inform regulatory and reimbursement policies for electronically delivered health care services.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jamia.2002.0090049

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Cited by

See all 167

Metadata

Authors
Shea, S., Starren, J., Weinstock, R. S., Knudson, P. E., Teresi, J., Holmes, D., Palmas, W., Field, L., Goland, R., Tuck, C., Hripcsak, G., Capps, L., & Liss, D.
Venue
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Published
2002-01-01
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
49-62
ISSN
  • 1067-5027 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-974X
OpenAlex
W92663610
Cited by
167
References
11
FWCI
14.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Columbia University's Informatics for Diabetes Education and Telemedicine (IDEATel) Project: Rationale and Design. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/jamia.2002.0090049
The paper
Shea, S., Starren, J., Weinstock, R. S., Knudson, P. E., Teresi, J., Holmes, D., Palmas, W., Field, L., Goland, R., Tuck, C., Hripcsak, G., Capps, L., & Liss, D. (2002). Columbia University's Informatics for Diabetes Education and Telemedicine (IDEATel) Project: Rationale and Design. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. https://doi.org/10.1136/jamia.2002.0090049

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.