The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Columbia University's Informatics for Diabetes Education and Telemedicine (IDEATel) Project: Rationale and Design
Abstract
The Columbia University Informatics for Diabetes Education and Telemedicine (IDEATel) Project is a four-year demonstration project funded by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services with the overall goals of evaluating the feasibility, acceptability, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of telemedicine in the management of older patients with diabetes. The study is designed as a randomized controlled trial and is being conducted by a state-wide consortium in New York. Eligibility requires that participants have diabetes, are Medicare beneficiaries, and reside in federally designated medically underserved areas. A total of 1,500 participants will be randomized, half in New York City and half in other areas of the state. Intervention participants receive a home telemedicine unit that provides synchronous videoconferencing with a project-based nurse, electronic transmission of home fingerstick glucose and blood pressure data, and Web access to a project Web site. End points include glycosylated hemoglobin, blood pressure, and lipid levels; patient satisfaction; health care service utilization; and costs. The project is intended to provide data to help inform regulatory and reimbursement policies for electronically delivered health care services.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease with Pravastatin in Men with Hypercholesterolemia
Shepherd, J., Cobbe, S. M., Ford, I., Isles, C. G., Lorimer, A. R., Macfarlane, P. W., McKillop, J. H., & Packard, C. J. (1995) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199511163332001 · Cited by 7,449
Sacks, F. M., Pfeffer, M. A., Moye, L. A., Rouleau, J. L., Rutherford, J. D., Cole, T. G., Brown, L., Warnica, J. W., Arnold, J. M. O., Wun, C.-C., et al. (1996) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199610033351401 · Cited by 7,439
Hansson, L., Zanchetti, A., Carruthers, S. G., Dahlöf, B., Elmfeldt, D., Julius, S., Ménard, J., Rahn, K. H., Wedel, H., & Westerling, S. (1998) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(98)04311-6 · Cited by 5,728
Harris, M. I., Flegal, K. M., Cowie, C. C., Eberhardt, M. S., Goldstein, D. E., Little, R. R., Wiedmeyer, H.-M., & Byrd-Holt, D. D. (1998) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.21.4.518 · Cited by 2,703
Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus
The Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus (2003) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.26.2007.s5 · Cited by 2,689
Development of a short acculturation scale for hispanics
Marin, G., Sabogal, F., Marin, B. V., Otero-Sabogal, R., & Perez-Stable, E. J. (1987) · Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1177/07399863870092005 · Cited by 2,299
(2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200002103420603 · Cited by 1,534
Kinaan, M., Ding, H., & Triggle, C. R. (2015) · Medical Principles and Practice · doi:10.1159/000381643 · Cited by 1,515
Using Internet technology to deliver a behavioral weight loss program
Tate, D. F. (2001) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.285.9.1172 · Cited by 925 · cited 1×
“New reimbursement models and easy connectivity via the Internet have stimulated investment in information systems that directly influence patient behavior,”
Cited by
Interactive Health Communication Applications for people with chronic disease
Murray, E., Burns, J., See Tai, S., Lai, R., & Nazareth, I. (2005) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004274.pub4 · Cited by 722
Costs and benefits of health information technology.
Shekelle, P. G., Morton, S. C., & Keeler, E. B. (2006) · doi:10.23970/ahrqepcerta132 · Cited by 501
Bridging the Digital Divide: Reaching Vulnerable Populations
Chang, B. L., Bakken, S., Brown, S. S., Houston, T. K., Kreps, G. L., Kukafka, R., Safran, C., & Stavri, P. Z. (2004) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1197/jamia.m1535 · Cited by 313
Usability in the real world: assessing medical information technologies in patients’ homes
Kaufman, D. R., Patel, V. L., Hilliman, C., Morin, P. C., Pevzner, J., Weinstock, R. S., Goland, R., Shea, S., & Starren, J. (2003) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/s1532-0464(03)00056-x · Cited by 254
Self-citationHome telehealth reduces healthcare costs
Noel, H. C., Vogel, D. C., Erdos, J. J., Cornwall, D., & Levin, F. (2004) · Telemedicine Journal and e-Health · doi:10.1089/tmj.2004.10.170 · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Shea, S., Starren, J., Weinstock, R. S., Knudson, P. E., Teresi, J., Holmes, D., Palmas, W., Field, L., Goland, R., Tuck, C., Hripcsak, G., Capps, L., & Liss, D.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-01-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 49-62
- ISSN
- 1067-5027 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-974X
- OpenAlex
- W92663610
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 14.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Columbia University's Informatics for Diabetes Education and Telemedicine (IDEATel) Project: Rationale and Design. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/jamia.2002.0090049
- The paper
- Shea, S., Starren, J., Weinstock, R. S., Knudson, P. E., Teresi, J., Holmes, D., Palmas, W., Field, L., Goland, R., Tuck, C., Hripcsak, G., Capps, L., & Liss, D. (2002). Columbia University's Informatics for Diabetes Education and Telemedicine (IDEATel) Project: Rationale and Design. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. https://doi.org/10.1136/jamia.2002.0090049
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.