Cited by 35

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The predictive value of total serum IgE for a positive allergen specific IgE result

Sinclair, D, Peters, S A·2004·Journal of Clinical Pathology

Abstract

Background: Measurement of total serum IgE and allergen specific IgE is often requested to assess possible allergy. As public awareness increases, so do requests for allergy assessment; unless there is a clear “allergen suspect” in the history, several allergen specific IgE requests may be made. This increases the likelihood of detecting borderline increases in allergen specific IgE of uncertain relevance, and has important cost implications for the service. Aims: To provide an evidence base for this observation. Methods: In this retrospective observational study, results from 301 patients under 16 years of age from whom blood was taken for “allergy testing” from March 2001 to February 2003 were studied. Results: Allergen specific IgE testing in children with low total serum IgE concentrations (<10 IU/litre) yielded very few positive results (three of 73 children), except in those being investigated for an acute reaction to a single food; when IgE was 11–20 kU/litre, 13 of 73 children had positive allergen specific IgE; in the 21–40 kU/litre IgE group, 16 of 74 children had positive allergen specific IgE and in the 41–80 kU/litre group, 22 of 81 had positive allergen specific IgE. Conclusions: Allergen specific IgE testing in children with low IgE concentrations (<10 kU/litre) produces few positive results in patients with non-specific symptoms. Laboratories should perform allergy testing for specific allergens regardless of total IgE concentration only when there are convincing clinical reasons to do so, and should not proceed with this if the total IgE is <10 kU/litre and the presenting symptoms are non-specific.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jcp.2004.017681

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. 10.1046/j.1365-2222.1998.00241.x · DOI
  2. 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1984.tb01966.x · DOI
  3. 1996, Pediatr Med Chir, 18, 169
  4. 1992, Allergy, 47, 484, 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1992.tb00669.x · DOI
  5. 10.1016/0009-8981(81)90454-X · DOI
  6. 1982, Acta Paediatr Scand, 71, 489, 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1982.tb09457.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 35

Metadata

Authors
Sinclair, D., & Peters, S. A.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Pathology
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2004-08-27
Volume
57
Issue
9
Pages
956-959
ISSN
  • 0021-9746
  • 1472-4146
Cited by
35
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The predictive value of total serum IgE for a positive allergen specific IgE result. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/jcp.2004.017681
The paper
Sinclair, D., & Peters, S. A. (2004). The predictive value of total serum IgE for a positive allergen specific IgE result. Journal of Clinical Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.2004.017681