The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Method for the measurement of antioxidant activity in human fluids
Open accessAbstract
Aim —To develop a new, simple, and cheap method for estimating antioxidant activity in human fluids. Methods —The assay measured the capacity of the biological fluids to inhibit the production of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) from sodium benzoate under the influence of the free oxygen radicals derived from Fenton's reaction. A solution of 1 mmol/litre uric acid was used as standard. Results —The following mean (SD) antioxidative activities were found (as uric acid) in the various biological fluids: serum, 2.04 (0.20) mmol/litre; urine, 176.5 (25.6) μmol/litre; cerebrospinal fluid, 95.0 (26.9) μmol/litre; aqueous humour oculi, 61.25 (9.9) μmol/litre; saliva, 838.5 (48.2) μmol/litre; tears, 247.0 (17.0) μmol/litre; ascites fluid, 270.0 (63.3) μmol/litre; kidney cyst fluid, 387.1 (28.1) μmol/litre. Small samples of the biological material were needed for the analyses: 10 μl of serum and 50–100 μl of other body fluids. In the sera of 48 healthy individuals there was a significant positive correlation between values obtained with the Randox method (as a reference method) and the new method proposed here (correlation coefficient, 0.8728; mean difference between methods, <0.4%). Conclusions —This method is easy, rapid, reliable, and practical for the routine measurement of total antioxidant activity in serum and other human body fluids. Small samples of biological material are needed for the analyses and the results are comparable with the reference (Randox) method.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
Martin Bland, J., & Altman, D. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90837-8 · Cited by 47,965
Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement
Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (2010) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.10.001 · Cited by 5,220
Uric acid-iron ion complexes. A new aspect of the antioxidant functions of uric acid
Davies, K. J. A., Sevanian, A., Muakkassah-Kelly, S. F., & Hochstein, P. (1986) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj2350747 · Cited by 558
Cited by
A novel automated method to measure total antioxidant response against potent free radical reactions
Erel, O. (2004) · Clinical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2003.10.014 · Cited by 1,765
Katerji, M., Filippova, M., & Duerksen-Hughes, P. (2019) · Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity · doi:10.1155/2019/1279250 · Cited by 429
Increased oxidative stress in children exposed to passive smoking
Kosecik, M., Erel, O., Sevinc, E., & Selek, S. (2005) · International Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2004.05.069 · Cited by 320
Apak, R., Güçlü, K., Özyürek, M., Karademi˙r, S. E., & Altun, M. (2005) · Free Radical Research · doi:10.1080/10715760500210145 · Cited by 305
Kowluru, R. A., Kowluru, V., Xiong, Y., & Ho, Y.-S. (2006) · Free Radical Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2006.01.012 · Cited by 233
Metadata
- Authors
- Koracevic, D., Koracevic, G., Djordjevic, V, Andrejevic, S., & Cosic, V
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Pathology
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2001-05
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 356-361
- ISSN
- 0021-9746 (ISSN-L)
- 1472-4146
- OpenAlex
- W2118090983
- Cited by
- 1,974
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 3.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Method for the measurement of antioxidant activity in human fluids. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/jcp.54.5.356
- The paper
- Koracevic, D., Koracevic, G., Djordjevic, V, Andrejevic, S., & Cosic, V. (2001). Method for the measurement of antioxidant activity in human fluids. Journal of Clinical Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.54.5.356
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
