Cited by 32Data Quality and ManagementMedical Coding and Health InformationElectronic Health Records Systems

Opening the black box of record linkage

Open access
Harron, Katie, Wade, Angie, Muller-Pebody, Berit, Goldstein, Harvey, Gilbert, Ruth·2012·Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

Abstract

The UK government's plan for a secure data service— Strengthening the international competitiveness of UK life sciences research —will transform the availability of linked electronic health records to support service provision, planning and research. In April 2012, the new Clinical Practice Research Datalink was established to provide linked national e-health records, facilitating large-scale, population-based research and service evaluation. Such comprehensive data-linkages have been successfully established in other areas, notably in Western Australia, where a code of best practice …

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jech-2012-201376

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. McGlincy M, ed. A Bayesian Record Linkage Methodology for Multiple Imputation of Missing Links. ASA Section on Survey Research Methods. 2004. http://www.amstat.org/ sections/srms/Proceedings/y2004/files/Jsm2004-000683.pdf (accessed 6 Mar 2012).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harron, K., Wade, A., Muller-Pebody, B., Goldstein, H., & Gilbert, R.
Affiliations
  • University of London (GB)
  • Healthcare Associated Infection, Health Protection Agency, London UK
Corresponding author
Harron, Katie
Venue
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2012-06-15
Volume
66
Issue
12
Pages
1198.2-1198
ISSN
  • 0141-7681 (ISSN-L)
  • 0143-005X
  • 1470-2738
OpenAlex
W2125226349
Cited by
32
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Data Quality and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
Keywords
data linkage, electronic health records, Clinical Practice Research Datalink, health data security, population-based study, health service evaluation
MeSH terms
United Kingdom, Humans, Medical Record Linkage, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review