Cited by 36Infant Development and Preterm CareChild and Adolescent HealthChild Nutrition and Water Access

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Socioeconomic disadvantage and developmental delay among US children aged 18 months to 5 years

Open access
Simon, Alan E, Pastor, Patricia N, Avila, Rosa M, Blumberg, Stephen J·2013·Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

Abstract

Background: Few studies have examined the relationship between sociodemographic factors and a population-based measure of developmental delay in US children. We identify sociodemographic factors associated with unlikely, probable and possible developmental delay in preschool US children using nationally representative data. Methods: All children aged 18 months to 5 years in the 2007 National Survey of Children's Health were categorised into three groups based on the likelihood of developmental delay (unlikely delay, possible delay and probable delay) using a modified survey version of the Parents’ Evaluation of Developmental Status questionnaire. Bivariate and multivariate multinomial logistic regressions were used to assess relations between sociodemographic variables and risk of developmental delay. Results: Children had increased odds of probable delay (compared with unlikely delay) if they were older (adjusted OR (aOR)=1.41/additional year above the youngest age group (18 months–2 years), p<0.001), male (aOR=1.55, p<0.001), low birth weight (aOR=2.08, p<0.001), non-Hispanic black (aOR=1.50, p<0.01) or Hispanic in a non-English-speaking household (aOR=2.53, p<0.001) versus non-Hispanic white, had lower household income (aOR=1.33 for each decreasing category of poverty level, p<0.001), or received >10 h/week of care at another family's home (aOR=1.71, p<0.05). Only four characteristics (being older, male, low birth weight and Hispanic living in a non-English-speaking household) were associated with increased odds of possible delay compared with unlikely delay. Conclusions: Multiple factors, including demographic characteristics and indicators of social disadvantage, distinguish children with probable developmental delay from those unlikely to have developmental delay. Fewer factors identify children with possible delay.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jech-2013-202610

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Children from low-income families and those from minoritized communities have increased risk for developmental delay and are less likely to receive timely developmental support services than more socially advantaged peers.

    “Children from low-income families and those from minoritized communities face the double disadvantage of having increased risk for developmental delay and being less likely to receive timely developmental support services than their more socially advantaged peers.8, 9”

    From Sustained Effectiveness of a 211 Call Center With Early Childhood Care Coordination (2025) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Results and Discussion (page not provided) report increased odds of probable developmental delay with lower household income and among non-Hispanic Black children and Hispanic children in non-English-speaking households. The paper does not establish that these groups are less likely to receive timely developmental support services; the Discussion only suggests that access-to-care barriers may contribute to underdiagnosis among Hispanic children. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Simon, A. E., Pastor, P. N., Avila, R. M., & Blumberg, S. J.
Affiliations
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Corresponding author
Simon, Alan E
Venue
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2013-05-25
Volume
67
Issue
8
Pages
689-695
ISSN
  • 0141-7681 (ISSN-L)
  • 0143-005X
  • 1470-2738
OpenAlex
W2126245741
Cited by
36
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2
FWCI
3.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (CC999999)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Child and Adolescent Health
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
Keywords
developmental delay, socioeconomic deprivation, preschool children, low birth weight, household income, poverty, Hispanic children, parental age, sex differences, child care, National Survey of Children's Health, Parents' Evaluation of Developmental Status
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Birth Weight, Child, Developmental Disabilities, Child, Preschool, Cross-Sectional Studies, Ethnicity, Family Characteristics, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Infant, Male, Population Surveillance, Risk Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Logistic Models, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review