Cited by 179Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk ManagementHealth disparities and outcomesGlobal Health Care Issues

Why is life expectancy in England and Wales ‘stalling’?

Open access
Hiam, Lucinda, Harrison, Dominic, McKee, Martin, Dorling, Danny·2018·Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

Abstract

Several independent analyses, by both epidemiologists and actuaries, have concluded that the previous rate of improvement of life expectancy in England and Wales has now slowed markedly, and at older ages may even be reversing. However, although these findings have led the pension industry to reduce estimates of future liabilities, they have failed to elicit any significant concern in the Department of Health and Social Care. In this essay, we review the evidence on changing life expectancy, noting that the problems are greatest among older women. We then estimate the gap between what life expectancy is now and what it might have been had previous trends continued. At age 85, the gap is 0.34 years for women and 0.23 for men. We argue that recent changes cannot be dismissed as a temporary aberration. While the causes of this phenomenon are contested, there is growing evidence to point to the austerity policies implemented in recent years as at least a partial explanation. We conclude by calling for a fully independent enquiry to ascertain what is happening to life expectancy in England and Wales and what should be done about it.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jech-2017-210401

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hiam L, et al. J Epidemiol Community Health 2018;72:404-408. doi:10.1136/jech-2017-210401 Essay · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hiam, L., Harrison, D., McKee, M., & Dorling, D.
Affiliations
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • University of Lancashire (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
McKee, Martin
Venue
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2018-02-20
Volume
72
Issue
5
Pages
404-408
ISSN
  • 0141-7681 (ISSN-L)
  • 0143-005X
  • 1470-2738
OpenAlex
W2788995900
Cited by
179
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 1
FWCI
8.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
public-domain
Locations
  • Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Global Health Care Issues
Keywords
life expectancy, life expectancy trends, older women, age gap, austerity, pension liabilities, public health policy, England and Wales
MeSH terms
Aged, Cause of Death, England, Female, Humans, Life Expectancy, Male, Middle Aged, Mortality, Wales

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review