Effect of area poverty rate on cancer screening across US communities
Open accessAbstract
Study objective: To analyse the contextual effect of area poverty rate on never having been screened for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer by (1) describing the extent of the variation in screening behaviours among 98 US metropolitan areas; (2) determining if the variation in lack of screening can be explained by differences in the characteristics of the persons who resided in these areas; and (3) determining if living in a metropolitan area with a higher poverty rate increased the likelihood of never having been screened for cancer over and above individual characteristics. Design: Cross sectional survey using data from the 2002 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Multilevel logistic regression included both individual level factors as well as area poverty rate. Setting: Ninety eight areas across the USA. Participants: Over 118 000 persons residing in 98 areas; a sample aimed at estimating 48.3% of the US population age 18 or older. Main results: After adjustment for individual level factors, increasing area level poverty rate (per 5%) remained associated with never having had a mammogram (odds ratio (OR) = 1.28, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03 to 1.37); clinical breast examination (OR = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.11 to 1.48), colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy (OR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.19), and a faecal occult blood test (OR = 1.19, 95% CI: 1.12 to 1.27). Poverty rate was not independently associated with never having had a Pap smear (OR = 1.12; 95% CI: 0.90 to 1.41). The size of the variance among metropolitan or micropolitan statistical areas (MMSAs) varied by type of screening test, with intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from 4.9% (never having had a Pap smear) to 1.2% (never having had a colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy). Conclusions: Area poverty rate was independently associated with never having been screened for breast and colorectal cancer, but not cervical cancer. The size of the variance among MMSAs was modest at best.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Increasing area-level poverty rates are associated with decreased utilization of mammograms, clinical breast examinations, colonoscopies, sigmoidoscopies, and fecal occult blood tests.
“Increasing area-level poverty rates are associated with decreased utilization of mammograms, clinical breast examinations, colonoscopies, sigmoidoscopies, and fecal occult blood tests.39”
From Randomized, wait-list–controlled pilot study of app-delivered mindfulness for patients reporting chronic pain (2021) · cites this paper as [39]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Revisiting the Behavioral Model and Access to Medical Care: Does it Matter?
Andersen, R. M. (1995) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2137284 · Cited by 9,831 · see citing works
Partitioning Variation in Multilevel Models
Goldstein, H., Browne, W., & Rasbash, J. (2002) · Understanding Statistics · doi:10.1207/s15328031us0104_02 · Cited by 874 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Influence of Patients' Socioeconomic Status on Clinical Management Decisions: A Qualitative Study
Bernheim, S. M., Ross, J. S., Krumholz, H. M., & Bradley, E. H. (2008) · The Annals of Family Medicine · doi:10.1370/afm.749 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Geographic variation and effect of area-level poverty rate on colorectal cancer screening
Lian, M., Schootman, M., & Yun, S. (2008) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-8-358 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Self-citationMascaro, J. S., Singh, V., Wehrmeyer, K., Scott, B., Juan, J., McKenzie-Brown, A. M., Lane, O. P., & Haack, C. (2021) · PAIN Reports · doi:10.1097/pr9.0000000000000924 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
- Authors
- Schootman, M., Jeffe, D. B., Baker, E. A., & Walker, M. S.
- Affiliations
- Barnes-Jewish Hospital (US)
- Saint Louis University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Schootman, Mario
- Venue
- Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2006-02-13
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 202-207
- ISSN
- 0141-7681 (ISSN-L)
- 0143-005X
- 1470-2738
- PMC
- PMC2465556
- OpenAlex
- W2165815383
- Cited by
- 116
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 4.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center (CA91842)
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (HS 14095-01, R03 HS014095)
- National Cancer Institute (R21CA098594, R03CA091734, CA 98594, CA 91734, CA91842, P30CA091842)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
- Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
- Keywords
- cancer screening, breast cancer screening, cervical cancer screening, colorectal cancer screening, mammography, Pap smear, colonoscopy, fecal occult blood test, clinical breast examination, metropolitan statistical areas, socioeconomic disparities, contextual effects
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Breast Neoplasms, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Epidemiologic Methods, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Poverty, United States, Colorectal Neoplasms
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review