Cited by 116Global Cancer Incidence and ScreeningHealth disparities and outcomesColorectal Cancer Screening and Detection

Effect of area poverty rate on cancer screening across US communities

Open access
Schootman, Mario, Jeffe, Donna B, Baker, Elizabeth A, Walker, Mark S·2006·Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

Abstract

Study objective: To analyse the contextual effect of area poverty rate on never having been screened for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer by (1) describing the extent of the variation in screening behaviours among 98 US metropolitan areas; (2) determining if the variation in lack of screening can be explained by differences in the characteristics of the persons who resided in these areas; and (3) determining if living in a metropolitan area with a higher poverty rate increased the likelihood of never having been screened for cancer over and above individual characteristics. Design: Cross sectional survey using data from the 2002 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Multilevel logistic regression included both individual level factors as well as area poverty rate. Setting: Ninety eight areas across the USA. Participants: Over 118 000 persons residing in 98 areas; a sample aimed at estimating 48.3% of the US population age 18 or older. Main results: After adjustment for individual level factors, increasing area level poverty rate (per 5%) remained associated with never having had a mammogram (odds ratio (OR) = 1.28, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03 to 1.37); clinical breast examination (OR = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.11 to 1.48), colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy (OR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.19), and a faecal occult blood test (OR = 1.19, 95% CI: 1.12 to 1.27). Poverty rate was not independently associated with never having had a Pap smear (OR = 1.12; 95% CI: 0.90 to 1.41). The size of the variance among metropolitan or micropolitan statistical areas (MMSAs) varied by type of screening test, with intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from 4.9% (never having had a Pap smear) to 1.2% (never having had a colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy). Conclusions: Area poverty rate was independently associated with never having been screened for breast and colorectal cancer, but not cervical cancer. The size of the variance among MMSAs was modest at best.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jech.2005.041020

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schootman, M., Jeffe, D. B., Baker, E. A., & Walker, M. S.
Affiliations
  • Barnes-Jewish Hospital (US)
  • Saint Louis University (US)
Corresponding author
Schootman, Mario
Venue
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2006-02-13
Volume
60
Issue
3
Pages
202-207
ISSN
  • 0141-7681 (ISSN-L)
  • 0143-005X
  • 1470-2738
OpenAlex
W2165815383
Cited by
116
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center (CA91842)
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (HS 14095-01, R03 HS014095)
  • National Cancer Institute (R21CA098594, R03CA091734, CA 98594, CA 91734, CA91842, P30CA091842)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Keywords
cancer screening, breast cancer screening, cervical cancer screening, colorectal cancer screening, mammography, Pap smear, colonoscopy, fecal occult blood test, clinical breast examination, metropolitan statistical areas, socioeconomic disparities, contextual effects
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Breast Neoplasms, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Epidemiologic Methods, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Poverty, United States, Colorectal Neoplasms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review