Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 728

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Associations of neighbourhood greenness with physical and mental health: do walking, social coherence and local social interaction explain the relationships?

Sugiyama, T, Leslie, E, Giles-Corti, B, Owen, N·2008·Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

Abstract

Background: Studies have shown associations between health indices and access to “green” environments but the underlying mechanisms of this association are not clear. Objectives: To examine associations of perceived neighbourhood “greenness” with perceived physical and mental health and to investigate whether walking and social factors account for the relationships. Methods: A mailed survey collected the following data from adults (n = 1895) in Adelaide, Australia: physical and mental health scores (12-item short-form health survey); perceived neighbourhood greenness; walking for recreation and for transport; social coherence; local social interaction and sociodemographic variables. Results: After adjusting for sociodemographic variables, those who perceived their neighbourhood as highly green had 1.37 and 1.60 times higher odds of better physical and mental health, respectively, compared with those who perceived the lowest greenness. Perceived greenness was also correlated with recreational walking and social factors. When walking for recreation and social factors were added to the regression models, recreational walking was a significant predictor of physical health; however, the association between greenness and physical health became non-significant. Recreational walking and social coherence were associated with mental health and the relationship between greenness and mental health remained significant. Conclusions: Perceived neighbourhood greenness was more strongly associated with mental health than it was with physical health. Recreational walking seemed to explain the link between greenness and physical health, whereas the relationship between greenness and mental health was only partly accounted for by recreational walking and social coherence. The restorative effects of natural environments may be involved in the residual association of this latter relationship.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jech.2007.064287

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. 10.1136/jech.2005.043125 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1078/1618-8667-00019 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.02.001 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1016/j.puhe.2006.05.024 · DOI
  5. Rappe, 2006, Visiting outdoor green environments positively impacts self-rated health among older people in long-term care., Horttechnology, 16, 55, 10.21273/HORTTECH.16.1.0055 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00109-3 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80184-7 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1136/jech.2004.028399 · DOI
  10. Giles-Corti, 2005, Increasing walking—how important is distance to, attractiveness, and size of public open space?, Am J Prev Med, 28, 169, 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.018 · DOI
  11. 10.1136/jech.2003.014068 · DOI
  12. 10.1249/01.MSS.0000121955.03461.0A · DOI
  13. 10.1056/NEJMoa021067 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.diabres.2005.06.002 · DOI
  15. Murphy, 2002, Accumulating brisk walking for fitness, cardiovascular risk, and psychological health., Med Sci Sports Exerc, 34, 1468, 10.1097/00005768-200209000-00011 · DOI
  16. 10.1093/ije/dyg189 · DOI
  17. 10.1136/jech.56.12.913 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1177/001391659803000605 · DOI
  19. 10.1177/0193841X04264945 · DOI
  20. 10.1177/0013916503260236 · DOI
  21. 10.2105/AJPH.89.8.1187 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.07.025 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1552 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1080/00420980601023869 · DOI
  26. 10.1126/science.277.5328.918 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1177/109019810102800407 · DOI
  28. Kaplan R Kaplan S . The experience of nature: a psychological perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
  29. 10.1016/S0749-3797(00)00317-2 · DOI
  30. Humpel, 2004, Associations of location and perceived environmental attributes with walking in neighborhoods., Am J Health Promotion, 18, 239, 10.4278/0890-1171-18.3.239 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.023 · DOI
  32. 10.1177/001391602237250 · DOI
  33. 10.1186/1479-5868-2-5 · DOI
  34. Fulton, 2001, Field evaluation of energy expenditure from continuous and intermittent walking in women., Med Sci Sports Exerc, 33, 163, 10.1097/00005768-200101000-00025 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.05.005 · DOI
  36. Tilt, 2007, Using objective and subjective measures of neighborhood greenness and accessible destinations for understanding walking trips and BMI in Seattle, Washington., Am J Health Promotion, 21, 371, 10.4278/0890-1171-21.4s.371 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.healthplace.2006.07.002 · DOI

Cited by

See all 728

Metadata

Authors
Sugiyama, T., Leslie, E., Giles-Corti, B., & Owen, N.
Venue
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2008-04-15
Volume
62
Issue
5
Pages
e9-e9
ISSN
  • 0143-005X
  • 1470-2738
Cited by
728
References
6
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Associations of neighbourhood greenness with physical and mental health: do walking, social coherence and local social interaction explain the relationships? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/jech.2007.064287
The paper
Sugiyama, T., Leslie, E., Giles-Corti, B., & Owen, N. (2008). Associations of neighbourhood greenness with physical and mental health: do walking, social coherence and local social interaction explain the relationships? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2007.064287

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.