Cited by 90

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Cause-specific mortality: understanding uncertain tips of the disease iceberg.

Goldacre, M J·1993·Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE--To determine the extent to which individual diseases, when recorded as being present shortly before death, were certified as causes of death. DESIGN--Retrospective cohort study in which the "subjects" were computerised linked records. SETTING--Six districts in the Oxford Regional Health Authority area (covering a population of 1.9 million people). SUBJECTS--Linked abstracts of hospital records and death certificates for people who died within four weeks and, for some diseases, within one year of hospital admission. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--The percentage of people with each disease for whom the disease was recorded as the underlying cause of death, was recorded elsewhere on the death certificate, or was not certified as a cause of death at all. RESULTS--Three broad patterns of certification are distinguished. Firstly, there were diseases that were usually recorded on death certificates when death occurred within four weeks of hospital care of them. Examples included lung cancer (on 91% of such death certificates), breast cancer (92%), leukaemia and lymphoma (90%), anterior horn cell disease (89%), multiple sclerosis (89%), myocardial infarction (90%), stroke (93%), aortic aneurysm (87%), and spina bifida (89%). These diseases were also usually certified as the underlying cause of death. Secondly, there were diseases which, when present within four weeks of death, were commonly recorded on death certificates but often not as the underlying cause of death. Examples included tuberculosis (on 76% of such certificates; underlying cause on 54%), thyroid disease (49%; 21%), diabetes mellitus (69%; 30%) and hypertension (43%; 22%). Thirdly, there were conditions which, when death occurred within four weeks of their treatment, were recorded on the death certificate in a minority of cases only. Examples of these included fractured neck of femur (on 25% of such certificates), asthma (37%), and anaemia (22%). Not surprisingly, there was "convergence" in certification practice towards the common cardiovascular and respiratory causes of death. There was also evidence that conditions regarded as avoidable causes of death may not have been certified when present at death in some patients. CONCLUSION--When uses are made of mortality statistics alone, it is important to know which category of certification practice the disease of interest is likely to be in. Linkage between morbidity and mortality records, and multiple cause analysis of mortality, would considerably improve the ability to quantify mortality associated with individual diseases.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jech.47.6.491

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Last JM. The Iceberg 'Completing the clinical picture in general practice. I.aicet 1963; ii: 28-31.
  2. Cabot RC. Diagnostic pitfalls identified during a study of three thousand autopsies. JA.11A 1912; 59: 2295-8.
  3. Swartout HO, Webster RG. To what degree are mortality statistics dependable? Am]i Pu.blic Healthl 1940; 30: 811-5. · DOI
  4. Pohlen K, Emmerson H. Errors in clinical statements of causes of death. Am]iY Puiblic Healtli 1943; 33: 505 16.
  5. James G, Patton RE, Heslin AS. Accuracy of cause-ofdeath statements on death certificates. PIublic Hcalth Rep 1955; 70: 39-51.
  6. Heasman \A. Accuracy of death certification. PFroc R.Soc A/cd 1962; 55: 733-6.
  7. Cameron H.M,.McGoogan E. A prospectixe study of 1 152 hospital autopsies; 1. Inaccuracies in death certification. Y Patliol 1981; 133: 273-83.
  8. Cameron HM, M'AcGoogan E. A prospective study of 1152 hospital autopsies; 2. Analysis of inaccuracies in clinical diagnoses and their significance.YPIathl/ 1981 133: 285-300.
  9. Acheson ED. Mledical record linkage. Oxford: Oxford Universitv Press, 1967.
  10. Waugh NR, Dallas JH, Jung RT, Newton RW. Mortality in a cohort of Diabeto/lo(gia diabetic patients. 1989; 32: 103-4. Causes and relative risks.
  11. Maxwell JD, Knapman P. Effect of coroners' rules on death certification for alcoholic liver disease. BA!] 1985;291: 708.
  12. Guralnick L. Some problems in the use of multiple causes of death. Journal of Chromic Diseases 1966; 19: 979-90. · DOI
  13. Dorn HF. Some considerations in the revision of the international statistical classification. Ptublic Health Rep 1964; 79: 175-9. · DOI
  14. Erhardt CL, Weiner L. Changes in mortalitv statistics through the use of the New International Statistical Classification. Anti Puiblic Health 1950; 40: 6 -16.
  15. Harvey I. Falls in death from respiratory disease (letter). Lancet 1991; 338 (877-9): 1407. · DOI
  16. Leadbeatter S. Semantics of death certification. 7 R Coll Phvsicians Louid 1986; 20: 129-32.
  17. Knight B. The cause of death. 7 R Soc Aled 1986; 79: 191 2.
  18. Zumwalt RE, Ritter MR. Incorrect death certification: an invitation to obfuscation. Postgrad Aled 1987; 81: 245-54. · DOI
  19. Niven R. The cause of death. JR Soc,lc.d 1986; 79: 623.
  20. Kircher T, Anderson RE. Cause of death: proper completion of the death certificate. _AMIA 1987; 258: 349 52.
  21. Balarajan R. Certification of death and the clinician. Hcaltlz Trends 1983; 15: 53 6.
  22. Charlton JRH, Hartlev RM, Silver R, Holland WW. Geographical variation in mortality from conditions amenable to medical intervention in England and W'ales. Lanicet 1983; i: 691 6.
  23. Mackenbach JP, Bouvier-Colle MH, Jougla E. "Avoidable" mortality and health services: a review of aggregate data studies. 7 Epidemiol Ccnnimuitv Health 1990; 44: 106-11.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Goldacre, M. J.
Venue
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1993-12
Volume
47
Issue
6
Pages
491-496
ISSN
  • 0143-005X
  • 1470-2738
Cited by
90
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review