Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 183

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Work characteristics and psychiatric disorder in civil servants in London.

Open access
Stansfeld, S A, North, F M, White, I, Marmot, M G·1995·Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE--To describe the association between self reported and externally assessed work characteristics and psychiatric disorder. DESIGN--Analysis of questionnaire data collected from the first phase of the Whitehall II study, a cohort study of an employed population. SETTING--Twenty civil service departments in London. PARTICIPANTS--Altogether 6900 male and 3414 female civil servants aged 35-55 years. MAIN RESULTS--High levels of subjective social support at work, control at work, job variety, and skill use were associated with greater satisfaction and wellbeing and less psychiatric disorder measured by the 30 item general health questionnaire (GHQ). High levels of subjective work pace and conflicting demands were associated with less satisfaction and wellbeing and greater psychiatric disorder. The combined effects of work characteristics were similar to the effects of the work characteristics considered separately, except that for men there was a small interaction between psychological demands and control on the GHQ. There was little overall support for the two factor job strain model. In contrast, objective indices of work were generally not associated with the psychological indices. Findings in men and women were generally comparable and were not significantly influenced by employment grade. CONCLUSIONS--Negative affectivity and a tendency to report negatively about both work and the psychological indices may partly explain the difference in the findings between subjective and objective work characteristics. However, subjective work characteristics were still associated with psychiatric disorder after adjusting for negative affectivity. The potential confounding effects of employment grade did not explain the association between either subjective or objective work characteristics and the psychological indices. While modifications to the work environment may directly reduce certain adverse physical health effects, the influence of work place design and management on psychological wellbeing, satisfaction, and psychiatric disorder may be mediated through subjective perceptions of the work environment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jech.49.1.48

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Kasl SV. Mental health and work environment: an examination of the evidence.Journal of Occupational Medicine 1973;15:509-1 8.
  2. Payne R, Fletcher BC. Job demands, supports, and constraints as predictors of psychological strain among schoolteachers. Journal of Vocational Behaviour 1983;22: 136-47. · DOI
  3. Hesketh B, Shouksmith G. Job and non-job activities, job satisfaction and mental health among veterinarians. J7ournal of Occupational Behaviour 1986;7:325-39. · DOI
  4. Johnson JV, Hall EM. Job strain, work place support and cardiovascular disease - a cross-sectional study of a random sample of the Swedish working population. Am J Public Health 1988;78:1336-42. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Johnson JV, Hall EM,Theorell T. Combined effects of job strain and social isolation on cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality in a random sample of Swedish male working population. Scand J Work Environ Health 1989;15:271-9. · DOI · Paper page
  6. Brief AP, Burke MJ, George JM, Robinson BS, Webster J. Should negative affectivity remain an unmeasured variable in the study of job stress? J Appl Psychol 1988;73:193-8. · DOI · Paper page
  7. Stansfeld SA, Marmot MG. Social class and minor psychiatric disorder: a validated Screening Survey using the General Health Questionnaire in British Civil Servants. Psychol Med 1992;22:739-49. · DOI · Paper page
  8. North FM. Work and absence from work. London: University of London, 1990. PhD dissertation.
  9. Guendelman 5, Silberg MG. The health consequences of maquiladora work: women on the US-Mexican border. Am J Public Health 1993;83:37-44. · doi:10.2105/ajph.83.1.37
  10. Cohen PY, Spector PE. Negative affectivity as the underlying cause of correlations between stressors and strains. JAppl Psychol 1991;76:398-407.

Cited by

See all 183

Metadata

Authors
Stansfeld, S. A., North, F. M., White, I., & Marmot, M. G.
Venue
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1995-02
Volume
49
Issue
1
Pages
48-53
ISSN
  • 0141-7681 (ISSN-L)
  • 0143-005X
  • 1470-2738
OpenAlex
W1969202963
Cited by
183
References
3
FWCI
17.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Work characteristics and psychiatric disorder in civil servants in London. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/jech.49.1.48
The paper
Stansfeld, S. A., North, F. M., White, I., & Marmot, M. G. (1995). Work characteristics and psychiatric disorder in civil servants in London. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.49.1.48

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.