Cited by 113Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Treatment and AccessPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Development of a scale to measure symptoms of anxiety and depression in the general UK population: the psychiatric symptom frequency scale.

Open access
Lindelow, M, Hardy, R, Rodgers, B·1997·Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The psychiatric symptom frequency (PSF) scale was developed to assess symptoms of anxiety and depression (i.e. affective symptoms) experienced over the past year in the general population. This study aimed to examine the distribution of PSF scores, internal consistency, and factor structure and to investigate relationships between total scores for this scale and other indicators of poor mental health. PARTICIPANTS: The Medical Research Council national survey of health and development, a class stratified cohort study of men and women followed up from birth in 1946, with the most recent interview at age 43 when the PSF scale was administered. MAIN RESULTS: The PSF scale showed high internal consistency between the 18 items (Cronbach's alpha = 0.88). Ratings on items of the scale reflected one predominant factor, incorporating both depression and anxiety, and two additional factors of less statistical importance, one reflecting sleep problems and the other panic and situational anxiety. Total scores were calculated by adding 18 items of the scale, and high total scores were found to be strongly associated with reports of contact with a doctor or other health professional and use of prescribed medication for "nervous or emotional trouble or depression," and with suicidal ideas. CONCLUSIONS: The PSF is a useful and valid scale for evaluating affective symptoms in the general population. It is appropriate for administration by lay interviewers with minimal training, is relatively brief, and generates few missing data. The total score is a flexible measure which can be used in continuous or binary form to suit the purposes of individual investigations, and provides discrimination at lower as well as upper levels of symptom severity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jech.51.5.549

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Kessler RC, McGonagle KA, Zhao S, et al. Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of DSM-III-R psychiatric disorders in the United States. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1994;51:8-19.
  2. Eaton WW, Ritter C. Distinguishing anxiety and depression with field survey data. Psychol Med 1988;18:155-66.
  3. Feldman LA. Distinguishing depression and anxiety in self- report: Evidence from confirmatory factor analysis on non- clinical and clinical samples. Jf Consult Clin Psychol 1993;61:631-38.
  4. Hunt C, Andrews G. Comorbidity in the anxiety disorders: the use of a life-chart approach. J Psychiatric Res 1995;29: 467-80.
  5. Goldberg DP, Huxley P. Common mental disorders: a bio-social model. London: Routledge, 1992.
  6. Paykel ES, ed. Handbook of affective disorders. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press, 1992.
  7. Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement 1977; 1: 385-401.
  8. Goldberg DP. The detection of psychiatric illness by question- naire. London: Oxford University Press, 1972.
  9. Goldberg DP, Hillier VF. A scaled version of the general health questionnaire. Psychol Med 1979; 9: 139-45.
  10. Wing JK. Use and misuse of the PSE. BrJ Psychiatry 1983; 143: 111-17.
  11. Wing JK, Cooper JE, Sartorius N. Present State examination. London: Cambridge University Press, 1974.
  12. Wadsworth MEJ. The imprint of time: childhood, history and adult life. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991.
  13. Rodgers B, Mann SA. The reliability and validity of PSE assessment by lay interviewers: a national population survey. Psychol Med 1986; 16: 689-700.
  14. Rodgers B. Behaviour and personality in childhood as predictors of adult psychiatric disorder. Y Child Psychol Psy- chiatry 1990; 31: 393-414.
  15. Rodgers B. Socio-economic status, employment and neuro- sis. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 199 1;26: 104-14.
  16. Dohrenwend BP, Shrout PE, Egri G, Mendelsohn FS. Non- specific psychological distress and other dimensions of psy- chopathology. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1980; 37: 1229-36.
  17. Hirst MA. Evaluating the Malaise inventory: an item analy- sis. Soc Psychiatry 1983; 18: 181-84.
  18. McGee R, Williams S, Silva PA. An evaluation of the Malaise inventory. _ Psychosom Res 1986; 10: 147-52. 556 on August 14, 2023 by guest. Protected by copyright. http://jech.bmj.com/ J Epidemiol Community Health: first published as 10.1136/jech.51.5.549 on 1 October 1997. Downloaded from The psychiatric symptom frequenicy scale 26 Wadsworth MEJ, Mann SL, Rodgers B, Kuh DL, Hilder WS, Yusuf EJ. Loss and representativeness in a 43 year follow-up of a national cohort. J Epidenmiol Conmmtutnity Health 1992; 46: 300-4.
  19. Hsiao JK, Bartko JJ, Potter WZ. Diagnosing diagnoses: receiver operating characteristic methods and psychiatry. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1989; 46: 664-67.
  20. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982; 143: 29-36.
  21. Rodgers B. Pathways between parental divorce and adult depression. 7 Child Psy,chol Psychiatry 1994; 35: 1289-308.
  22. Rodgers B. Reported parental behaviour and adult affective symptoms. 1. Associations and moderating factors. Psychol Med 1996;26:51-61.
  23. Grant G, Nolan M, Ellis N. A reappraisal of the Malaise inventory. Soc Psychiatry Psychiat Epideniol 1990;25:170- 78.
  24. Mackinnon A, Christensen H, Jorm AF, Henderson AS, Scott R, Korten AE. A latent trait analysis of an inventory designed to detect symptoms of anxiety and depression using an elderly community sample. Psychol Med 1994;24: 977-86.
  25. Eaton WW, Dryman A, Sorenson A, McCutcheon A. DSM-III major depressive disorder in the community: A latent class analysis of data from the NIMH Epidemiologic catchment area programme. Br ] Psychiatry 1989;155:48- 54.
  26. Bedford A, Foulds GA, Sheffield BF. A new personal distur- bance scale (DSSI/SAD). Br J Soc Clin Psychol 1976;15: 387-94.
  27. Goodchild ME, Duncan-Jones P. Chronicity and the general health questionnaire. Brit _7 Psychiat 1985;146:55- 61.
  28. Rodgers B, Power C, Hope S. Parental divorce and adult psychological distress: evidence from a national birth cohort. In press.
  29. Goldberg DP, Bridges K, Duncan-Jones P, Grayson D. Dimensions of neuroses seen in primary-care settings. Psy- cholMed 1987;17:461-70.
  30. Henderson JG, Pollard CA, Jacobi KA, Merkel WT. Help-seeking patterns of community residents with depres- sive symptoms. Affect Disorders 1992; 26: 157-62.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lindelow, M., Hardy, R., & Rodgers, B.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Venue
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1997-10
Volume
51
Issue
5
Pages
549-557
ISSN
  • 0141-7681 (ISSN-L)
  • 0143-005X
  • 1470-2738
OpenAlex
W2068345173
Cited by
113
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
anxiety, depression, affective symptoms, scale development, factor structure, internal consistency, sleep disorders, panic, suicidal ideation, mental health, general population
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Depression, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, ROC Curve, Suicide, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review