The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Collecting behavioural data using the world wide web: considerations for researchers
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To identify and describe advantages, challenges, and ethical considerations of web based behavioural data collection. Methods: This discussion is based on the authors’ experiences in survey development and study design, respondent recruitment, and internet research, and on the experiences of others as found in the literature. Results: The advantages of using the world wide web to collect behavioural data include rapid access to numerous potential respondents and previously hidden populations, respondent openness and full participation, opportunities for student research, and reduced research costs. Challenges identified include issues related to sampling and sample representativeness, competition for the attention of respondents, and potential limitations resulting from the much cited “digital divide”, literacy, and disability. Ethical considerations include anonymity and privacy, providing and substantiating informed consent, and potential risks of malfeasance. Conclusions: Computer mediated communications, including electronic mail, the world wide web, and interactive programs will play an ever increasing part in the future of behavioural science research. Justifiable concerns regarding the use of the world wide web in research exist, but as access to, and use of, the internet becomes more widely and representatively distributed globally, the world wide web will become more applicable. In fact, the world wide web may be the only research tool able to reach some previously hidden population subgroups. Furthermore, many of the criticisms of online data collection are common to other survey research methodologies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Practice of Social Research
Neustadtl, A., & Babbie, E. (1989) · Teaching Sociology · doi:10.2307/1318433 · Cited by 14,398
Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use
Streiner, D. L., Norman, G. R., & Cairney, J. (1989) · Cited by 9,595
The Practice of Social Research.
Williams, D. G., & Babbie, E. R. (1976) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2062956 · Cited by 7,194
Plan 9 From Cyberspace: The Implications of the Internet for Personality and Social Psychology
McKenna, K. Y. A., & Bargh, J. A. (2000) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0401_6 · Cited by 1,506
Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity
Joinson, A. N. (2001) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.36 · Cited by 1,458
Using Internet technology to deliver a behavioral weight loss program
Tate, D. F. (2001) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.285.9.1172 · Cited by 925
McKenna, K. Y. A., & Bargh, J. A. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.75.3.681 · Cited by 843
Social desirability, anonymity, and internet-based questionnaires
Joinson, A. (1999) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03200723 · Cited by 812
World-Wide Web survey research: Benefits, potential problems, and solutions
Schmidt, W. C. (1997) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03204826 · Cited by 620
Cybersex users, abusers, and compulsives: New findings and implications
Cooper, A., Delmonico, D. L., & Burg, R. (2000) · Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity · doi:10.1080/10720160008400205 · Cited by 590
Cited by
Sabin, J. A., Marini, M., & Nosek, B. A. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048448 · Cited by 439
Nicolaidis, C., Raymaker, D., McDonald, K., Dern, S., Boisclair, W. C., Ashkenazy, E., & Baggs, A. (2013) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-012-2262-7 · Cited by 419
Ramo, D. E., & Prochaska, J. J. (2012) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1878 · Cited by 404
Online interaction. Effects of storytelling in an internet breast cancer support group
Høybye, M. T., Johansen, C., & Tjørnhøj-Thomsen, T. (2005) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.837 · Cited by 317
Doing Synchronous Online Focus Groups With Young People: Methodological Reflections
Fox, F. E., Morris, M., & Rumsey, N. (2007) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732306298754 · Cited by 248
Metadata
- Authors
- Rhodes, S. D., Bowie, D. A., & Hergenrather, K. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 68-73
- ISSN
- 0141-7681 (ISSN-L)
- 0143-005X
- 1470-2738
- OpenAlex
- W2160780574
- Cited by
- 485
- References
- 61
- FWCI
- 33.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Collecting behavioural data using the world wide web: considerations for researchers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/jech.57.1.68
- The paper
- Rhodes, S. D., Bowie, D. A., & Hergenrather, K. C. (2003). Collecting behavioural data using the world wide web: considerations for researchers. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.57.1.68
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.