Cervical cancer screening (Pap testing) behaviours and acceptability of human papillomavirus self-testing among lesbian and bisexual women aged 21–26 years in the USA
Open accessAbstract
Objective: Lesbian and bisexual women are at risk for human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and cervical disease. We examined cervical cancer screening (Pap testing) behaviours among these women and their acceptability of HPV self-testing at home, a potential cervical cancer screening strategy. Methods: We analysed data from a national sample of lesbian and bisexual women aged 21–26 years (n=418) who completed our online survey in Autumn 2013. Logistic regression identified correlates of (1) having had a Pap test in the last 3 years and (2) willingness to use an HPV self-test at home. Results: About 70% of women had undergone a Pap test in the last 3 years. Pap testing was more common among women who had disclosed their sexual orientation to their health care provider [odds ratio (OR)=2.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02–3.95] and less common among women who self-identified as lesbian (OR=0.48, 95% CI 0.25–0.93). Just over half the women (51%) were willing to use an HPV self-test at home. Women were more willing to use an HPV self-test at home if they were older (OR=1.16, 95% CI 1.03–1.30) or reported higher levels of worry about getting an HPV-related disease (OR=1.28, 95% CI 1.01–1.63). The most common concerns about HPV self-testing at home were using the test incorrectly (70%) and test accuracy (64%). Conclusions: Many young lesbian and bisexual women have not had a recent Pap test. HPV self-testing at home may be a promising future strategy for reaching and screening these women. Findings highlight beliefs and concerns that could be addressed by self-test programmes.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Among AGYW attending a teen health centre in the USA, acceptability for both self-sampling and clinician sampling was high.
“Among AGYW attending a teen health centre in the USA, acceptability for both self-sampling and clinician sampling was high.”
From HPV self-sampling for cervical cancer screening: a systematic review of values and preferences (2021) · cites this paper as [63]
Methods (Study Design; page unavailable) says participants were lesbian and bisexual women aged 21–26 recruited through an online LGBT panel, not attendees of a teen health centre. Results (HPV Self-Testing; page unavailable) reports 51% willing to use an HPV self-test at home, rather than high acceptability for both self- and clinician sampling; clinician-sampling acceptability was not measured. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredAmong AGYW attending a teen health centre in the USA, most participants expressed a preference for clinician sampling.
“However, most participants expressed a preference for clinician sampling.”
From HPV self-sampling for cervical cancer screening: a systematic review of values and preferences (2021) · cites this paper as [63]
The Methods (Study Design; page unavailable) describe a nationwide online panel of lesbian and bisexual women aged 21–26, not attendees of a teen health centre. The Results (HPV Self-Testing; page unavailable) report that 44% would rather go to a doctor for screening, not most participants; 51% were willing to self-test at home. The paper did not directly measure a preference between clinician and self-sampling. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn an online survey of lesbian and bisexual AGYW in the USA, 51% reported willingness to self-sample at home.
“In an online survey of lesbian and bisexual AGYW in the USA, 51% participants reported willingness to self-sample at home.”
From HPV self-sampling for cervical cancer screening: a systematic review of values and preferences (2021) · cites this paper as [63]
Willingness to self-sample at home among lesbian and bisexual AGYW increased with age and concern about getting an HPV-related disease.
“Willingness increased with age and concern about getting an HPV-related disease.”
From HPV self-sampling for cervical cancer screening: a systematic review of values and preferences (2021) · cites this paper as [63]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
(2001) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.91.6.947 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Genital human papillomavirus infection in women who have sex with women.
Marrazzo, J. M., Koutsky, L. A., Stine, K. L., Kuypers, J. M., Grubert, T. A., Galloway, D. A., Kiviat, N. B., & Handsfield, H. H. (1998) · The Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/314494 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
the Self-Sampling Study Working Group, Giorgi Rossi, P., Marsili, L. M., Camilloni, L., Iossa, A., Lattanzi, A., Sani, C., Di Pierro, C., Grazzini, G., Angeloni, C., et al. (2011) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6606040 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 32
- [1]Gillison ML Chaturvedi AK Lowy DR HPV prophylactic vaccines and the potential prevention of noncervical cancers in both men and women Cancer 2008 113 10 Suppl 3036 46 18980286 PMC6264789
- [2]IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Cancer-Preventive Strategies IARC handbooks of cancer prevention: cervix cancer screening 10 Lyon, France IARC Press 2005
- [4]Saslow D Solomon D Lawson HW American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer CA Cancer J Clin 2012 62 3 147 172 22422631 PMC3801360
- [6]Zhao FH Lewkowitz AK Chen F Pooled analysis of a self-sampling HPV DNA Test as a cervical cancer primary screening method J Natl Cancer Inst 2012 104 3 178 88 22271765 PMC3274511
- [7]Racey CS Withrow DR Gesink D Self-collected HPV testing improves participation in cervical cancer screening: A systematic review and meta-analysis Can J Public Health 2013 104 2 e159 66 23618210 PMC6973997
- [8]Richman AR Brewer NT Liebman AK Rinas AC Smith JS Optimising human papillomavirus self-testing for high risk women Sex Transm Infect 2011 87 2 118 22 21115503
- [9]Scarinci IC Litton AG Garces-Palacio IC Partridge EE Castle PE Acceptability and usability of self-collected sampling for HPV testing among African-American women living in the Mississippi Delta Womens Health Issues 2013 23 2 e123 30 23410619 PMC3596478
- [10]Vanderpool RC Jones MG Stradtman LR Smith JS Crosby RA Self-collecting a cervico-vaginal specimen for cervical cancer screening: An exploratory study of acceptability among medically underserved women in rural Appalachia Gynecol Oncol 2013 132 Suppl 1 S21 S25 24125753 PMC4753797
- [12]Marrazzo JM Gorgos LM Emerging sexual health issues among women who have sex with women Curr Infect Dis Rep (In press) 22302577
- [13]Marrazzo JM Genital human papillomavirus infection in women who have sex with women: a concern for patients and providers AIDS Patient Care STDS 2000 14 8 447 51 10977974
- [14]Hariri S Unger ER Sternberg M Prevalence of genital human papillomavirus among females in the United States, the National Health And Nutrition Examination Survey, 2003–2006 J Infect Dis 2011 204 4 566 73 21791659
- [15]Charlton BM Corliss HL Missmer SA Reproductive health screening disparities and sexual orientation in a cohort study of U.S. adolescent and young adult females J Adolesc Health 2011 49 5 505 10 22018565 PMC3200536
- [17]Agenor M Krieger N Austin SB Haneuse S Gottlieb BR Sexual orientation disparities in Papanicolaou test use among US women: the role of sexual and reproductive health services Am J Public Health 2014 104 2 e68 73 24328650 PMC3935675
- [18]Brown JP Tracy JK Lesbians and cancer: an overlooked health disparity Cancer Causes Control 2008 19 10 1009 20 18551371
- [19]Roberts SJ Patsdaughter CA Grindel CG Tarmina MS Health related behaviors and cancer screening of lesbians: results of the Boston Lesbian Health Project II Women Health 2004 39 4 41 55 15691084
- [20]Kerker BD Mostashari F Thorpe L Health care access and utilization among women who have sex with women: sexual behavior and identity J Urban Health 2006 83 5 970 9 16897415 PMC2438586
- [21]Matthews AK Brandenburg DL Johnson TP Hughes TL Correlates of underutilization of gynecological cancer screening among lesbian and heterosexual women Prev Med 2004 38 1 105 13 14672647
- [23]Reiter PL McRee AL Katz ML Paskett ED HPV vaccination among young adult gay and bisexual men in the United States American Journal of Public Health (In press) PMC4265907 25393178
- [25]Stevens PE Hall JM Stigma, health beliefs and experiences with health care in lesbian women Image J Nurs Sch 1988 20 2 69 73 3378820
- [26]Brewer NT Gottlieb SL Reiter PL Longitudinal predictors of human papillomavirus vaccine initiation among adolescent girls in a high-risk geographic area Sex Transm Dis 2011 38 3 197 204 20838362 PMC3025264
- [27]Gilbert P Brewer NT Reiter PL Ng TW Smith JS HPV vaccine acceptability in heterosexual, gay, and bisexual men Am J Mens Health 2011 5 4 297 305 20798149 PMC3083462
- [28]Reiter PL McRee AL Pepper JK Gilkey MB Galbraith KV Brewer NT Longitudinal predictors of human papillomavirus vaccination among a national sample of adolescent males Am J Public Health 2013 103 8 1419 27 23763402 PMC3725571
- [29]Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Cancer screening - United States, 2010 MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2012 61 3 41 45 22278157
- [30]Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Cervical cancer screening among women aged 18–30 years - United States, 2000–2010 MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2013 61 51–52 1038 1042 23282861
- [31]Smith AM Heywood W Ryall R Association between sexual behavior and cervical cancer screening J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2011 20 7 1091 6 21682554
- [32]Tracy JK Lydecker AD Ireland L Barriers to cervical cancer screening among lesbians J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2010 19 2 229 37 20095905 PMC2834453
- [34]Tracy JK Schluterman NH Greenberg DR Understanding cervical cancer screening among lesbians: a national survey BMC Public Health 2013 13 442,2458-13-442 PMC3693978 23642184
- [35]Buchmueller T Carpenter CS Disparities in health insurance coverage, access, and outcomes for individuals in same-sex versus different-sex relationships, 2000–2007 Am J Public Health 2010 100 3 489 95 20075319 PMC2820046
- [36]Collins SR Garber T Robertson R Realizing Health Reform’s Potential: How the Affordable Care Act is Helping Young Adults Stay Covered New York, NY The Commonwealth Fund 2011 21638800
- [37]Chai SJ Aumakhan B Barnes M Internet-based screening for sexually transmitted infections to reach nonclinic populations in the community: risk factors for infection in men Sex Transm Dis 2010 37 12 756 63 20644498 PMC3187615
- [38]Anhang R Nelson JA Telerant R Chiasson MA Wright TC Jr Acceptability of self-collection of specimens for HPV DNA testing in an urban population J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2005 14 8 721 8 16232104
- [39]Howard M Lytwyn A Lohfeld L Redwood-Campbell L Fowler N Karwalajtys T Barriers to acceptance of self-sampling for human papillomavirus across ethnolinguistic groups of women Can J Public Health 2009 100 5 365 9 19994740 PMC6973996
Cited by
Sorted by citations
HPV self-sampling for cervical cancer screening: a systematic review of values and preferences
Nishimura, H., Yeh, P. T., Oguntade, H., Kennedy, C. E., & Narasimhan, M. (2021) · BMJ Global Health · doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003743 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Cancer in Sexual and Gender Minority Patients: Are We Addressing Their Needs?
Cathcart-Rake, E. J. (2018) · Current Oncology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11912-018-0737-3 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Shpendi, S., Norman, P., Gibson-Miller, J., & Webster, R. (2025) · Women's Health · doi:10.1177/17455057251324309 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
- Authors
- Reiter, P. L., & McRee, A.-L.
- Affiliations
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute (US)
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Reiter, Paul L
- Venue
- Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2014-11-10
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 259-264
- ISSN
- 1471-1893 (ISSN-L)
- 2045-2098
- PMC
- PMC5253697
- OpenAlex
- W1998076965
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 3.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Cancer Institute (P30CA016058)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
- Keywords
- cervical cancer screening, Pap smear, HPV self-testing, lesbians, bisexual women, coming out, young women, acceptability
- MeSH terms
- Sexual and Gender Minorities, Adult, Attitude to Health, Bisexuality, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Care, United States, Vaginal Smears, Health Behavior, Homosexuality, Female, Papillomavirus Infections, Early Detection of Cancer, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review