Cited by 239Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchWomen's cancer prevention and managementReproductive tract infections research

Papanicolaou test screening and prevalence of genital human papillomavirus among women who have sex with women.

Open access
Jeanne Marisa Marrazzo, Laura A. Koutsky, Nancy B. Kiviat, J M Kuypers, Kathleen Stine·2001·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to examine frequency of and attitudes toward Papanicolaou (Pap) test screening in women who have sex with women (WSW) and to determine prevalence of genital human papillomavirus (HPV). METHODS: Women were eligible if they reported having engaged in sex with another woman in the preceding year Medical and sexual histories were obtained. Cervical specimens for Pap tests and cervical and vaginal specimens for HPV DNA testing were collected. RESULTS: HPV DNA was detected in 31 of 248 WSW (13%). Women who had never had sex with men were less likely to have undergone pelvic examinations and had fewer recent Pap tests. Reasons for not undergoing Pap tests included lack of insurance, previous adverse experiences, and belief that Pap tests were unnecessary. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the occurrence of genital HPV, WSW do not receive adequate Pap test screening. Pap test screening recommendations should not differ for WSW, regardless of sexual history with men.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.91.6.947

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marrazzo, J. M., Koutsky, L. A., Kiviat, N. B., Kuypers, J. M., & Stine, K.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
2001-06-01
Volume
91
Issue
6
Pages
947-952
ISSN
  • 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0048
OpenAlex
W1515230631
Cited by
239
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 12
FWCI
3.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA034493, CA 34493)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R29-AI41153-04, R29AI041153)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
Keywords
genital human papillomavirus, women who have sex with women, HPV prevalence, cervical cancer screening, barriers to screening, sexual minority women, HPV testing, cervical specimens
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Sexual Partners, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Vaginal Smears, Washington, Prevalence, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Homosexuality, Female, Papillomaviridae, Papillomavirus Infections, Papanicolaou Test

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review