Cited by 29Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical InnovationsSleep and Work-Related FatigueAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Methylphenidate Does Not Improve Cognitive Function in Healthy Sleep-Deprived Young Adults

Bray, Christopher L., Cahill, Kevin S., Oshier, Joseph T., Peden, Carmen S., Theriaque, Douglas W., Flotte, Terence R., Stacpoole, Peter W.·2004·Journal of Investigative Medicine

Abstract

Background Abuse of methylphenidate, a treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, is reported to be increasing among students for the purpose of improving cognition. Methods A single capsule, containing methylphenidate (20 mg) or placebo, was administered to healthy young adults orally following 24 hours of sleep deprivation. Measurements included percent change in score from sleep-deprived baseline on four standardized tests of cognitive function: Hopkins Verbal Learning, Digit Span, Modified Stroop, and Trail Making tests. Measurements also included percent changes in blood pressure and heart rate from sleep-deprived baseline and plasma methylphenidate concentration. Results Differences in cognitive test performance were not observed between intervention groups. In subjects receiving methylphenidate, mean percent changes from baseline for systolic blood pressure and heart rate were increased relative to placebo between 90 and 210 minutes following capsule administration (maximum increases of 9.45% and 11.03%, respectively). The timing of peak differences in physiologic measures did not correlate with peak serum methylphenidate concentrations. Exit questionnaire ratings of "capsule effect" and perceived performance on the postcapsule administration of the most challenging cognitive test were both higher (p = .044 and p = .009, respectively) for the methylphenidate group than for the placebo group. Conclusions Cognitive improvement among sleep-deprived young adult…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jim-52-03-34

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Six prior studies have largely found no evidence of meaningful neuropsychological improvement in students without ADHD who ingest a stimulant medication, including no improvements for working memory, response inhibition, vigilance, cognitive processing speed, planning, set-shifting, interference control, and distraction suppression.

    “Six studies have largely found no evidence of meaningful neuropsychological improvement in students without ADHD who ingest a stimulant medication.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bray, C. L., Cahill, K. S., Oshier, J. T., Peden, C. S., Theriaque, D. W., Flotte, T. R., & Stacpoole, P. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Florida Health (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
Venue
Journal of Investigative Medicine
Published
2004-04-01
Volume
52
Issue
3
Pages
192-201
ISSN
  • 1081-5589 (ISSN-L)
  • 1708-8267
OpenAlex
W1971238083
Cited by
29
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Investigative Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Center for Research Resources (RR-00082, M01RR000082)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Keywords
methylphenidate, sleep deprivation, cognitive function, stimulant abuse, young adults, blood pressure, heart rate, plasma drug concentration, sympathetic activation, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
MeSH terms
Adult, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Methylphenidate, Placebos, Psychological Tests, Sleep Deprivation, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review