Cited by 1Glioma Diagnosis and TreatmentImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers

O-09.03 Preliminary immunogenicity results from the dose escalation phase of a first-in-human study of the mRNA-based cancer vaccine CVGBM in patients with newly diagnosed MGMT-unmethylated glioblastoma

Open access
de Freitas Chama, LL, Romer Roche, P, Tabatabai, G, Freres, P, Hau, P, Glas, M, Seidel, C, von Baumgarten, L +10 more·2025·Oral Presentations

Abstract

Background The investigational therapeutic mRNA-based vaccine, CVGBM, encodes five class 1 and three class 2 segments derived from tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) with potential relevance in glioblastoma (GBM). Here, we present results from an ongoing, first-in-human study evaluating the safety and immunogenicity of CVGBM in patients with newly-diagnosed and surgically resected MGMT-unmethylated GBM. Materials and Methods Eligible patients were HLA-A*02:01-positive and had newly-diagnosed MGMT-unmethylated GBM (CNS WHO Grade 4) with a gross total or partial resection and completed radiotherapy with or without concomitant temozolomide. The study consists of a dose escalation and a dose expansion part. Patients received intramuscular injections of CVGBM on Days 1, 8, 15, 29, 43, 57 and 71 (main treatment period) plus six optional doses at 6-week intervals (maintenance period). Primary endpoints are safety, tolerability and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), whereas immunogenicity is an exploratory endpoint. Blood samples for assessment of cell-mediated immunity by interferon-y ELISPOT were collected on days 1, 43, 71, 78, 99, and 181 (Day 181 only if the patient did not receive maintenance treatment) and for assessment of serum cytokines and chemokines on days 1, 2, 8, 43, 44, 71, 72, and 78. Results 16 patients have been enrolled in the dose escalation part (three patients each received 12 µg, 25 µg, 50 µg, and seven received 100 µg of mRNA, respectively). All patients completed the 2-week DLT evaluation period without DLTs, and 100 µg was selected as the recommended dose for trial expansion based on safety data from all cohorts. The most common treatment emergent AEs were short-lived chills, pyrexia, headache and fatigue mostly of mild to moderate severity. Seven patients experienced Grade 3 AEs after the DLT period, assessed as potentially treatment related to CVGBM by investigators and evenly distributed across dose cohorts. CVGBM vaccine induced immunogenicity was mainly de novo and observed in 77% of evaluable patients, in which 67% showed an antigen-specific T cell immune response to multiple TAAs. Innate immune cytokines were also transiently induced upon vaccination. Conclusions CVGBM was generally well tolerated up to a dose level of 100 µg and was able to induce antigen-specific T-cell responses in the vast majority of patients. L.L. de Freitas Chama: A. Employment (full or part-time); Significant; CureVac SE. P. Romer Roche: A. Employment (full or part-time); Significant; CureVac SE. G. Tabatabai: None. P. Freres: None. P. Hau: None. M. Glas: None. C. Seidel: None. L. von Baumgarten: None. M.C. Burger: C. Other Research Support (supplies, equipment, receipt of drugs or other in-kind support); Modest; Boehringer Ingelheim. M. van den Bent: None. M. Falk: A. Employment (full or part-time); Significant; CureVac SE. P. Kelemen: A. Employment (full or part-time); Significant; CureVac SE. F. Schwenke: A. Employment (full or part-time); Significant; CureVac SE. J. Hess: A. Employment (full or part-time); Significant; CureVac SE. B. Srivastava: A. Employment (full or part-time); Significant; CureVac SE. T. Seibel: A. Employment (full or part-time); Significant; CureVac SE. S.D. Koch: A. Employment (full or part-time); Significant; CureVac SE. U. Gnad-Vogt: A. Employment (full or part-time); Significant; CureVac SE.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jitc-2025-itoc11.5

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Interim results from the initial dose escalation part of the Phase I trial demonstrated that TAA-specific T-cell responses were induced in the majority of patients.

    “Interim results from the initial dose escalation part of the study demonstrated that CVGBM was well tolerated with an acceptable safety profile and TAA-specific T-cell responses were induced in the majority of patients [47].”
  • Interim results from the initial dose escalation part of the Phase I trial demonstrated that CVGBM was well tolerated with an acceptable safety profile.

    “Interim results from the initial dose escalation part of the study demonstrated that CVGBM was well tolerated with an acceptable safety profile and TAA-specific T-cell responses were induced in the majority of patients [47].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Freitas Chama, L., Romer Roche, P., Tabatabai, G., Freres, P., Hau, P., Glas, M., Seidel, C., von Baumgarten, L., Burger, M., van den Bent, M., Falk, M., Kelemen, P., Schwenke, F., Hess, J., Srivastava, B., Seibel, T., Koch, S., & Gnad-Vogt, U.
Affiliations
  • CureVac SE, Tübingen, Germany
  • CureVac SE, Wiesbaden, Germany
  • Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research (DE)
  • Department of Medical Oncology, Liège University Hospital, Liège, Belgium
  • University Hospital Regensburg (DE)
  • University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
  • University Hospital Leipzig (DE)
  • Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Neuro-oncology, LMU, Munich, Germany
  • Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
  • Brain Tumor Centre, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
  • CureVac (Germany) (DE)
Venue
Oral Presentations
Published
2025-03-24
Pages
A3-A3
OpenAlex
W4408827465
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Oral Presentations (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Keywords
mRNA cancer vaccines, glioblastoma, MGMT unmethylated, tumor-associated antigens, immunogenicity, dose escalation, dose-limiting toxicity, cell-mediated immunity, interferon-gamma ELISPOT, HLA-A*0201, vaccine safety, maintenance dosing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review