Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 27Traditional Chinese Medicine StudiesComplementary and Alternative Medicine StudiesEthics and bioethics in healthcare

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Which medicine? Whose standard? Critical reflections on medical integration in China

Open access
Fan, Ruiping, Holliday, Ian·2007·Journal of Medical Ethics

Abstract

There is a prevailing conviction that if traditional medicine (TRM) or complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) are integrated into healthcare systems, modern scientific medicine (MSM) should retain its principal status. This paper contends that this position is misguided in medical contexts where TRM is established and remains vibrant. By reflecting on the Chinese policy on three entrenched forms of TRM (Tibetan, Mongolian and Uighur medicines) in western regions of China, the paper challenges the ideology of science that lies behind the demand that all traditional forms of medicine be evaluated and reformed according to MSM standards. Tibetan medicine is used as a case study to indicate the falsity of a major premise of the scientific ideology. The conclusion is that the proper integrative system for TRM and MSM is a dual standard based system in which both TRM and MSM are free to operate according to their own medical standards.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jme.2006.017483

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Qigeqitu. Modern mongolian medicine (Xiandai Mengyixue). Liaoyang: Liaoning Minzu Press, 2002.
  2. Li Y. Four medical tantras (Si Bu Yi Dian) (Translation. ) Beijing: People’s Health Press, 1983;46.
  3. Khangkar D. The Buddhist way of healing. New Delhi: Lustre Press, 1998:43.
  4. Sachs R. Tibetan Ayurveda: health secrets from the roof of the world. Rochester, VT: Healing Arts Press, 2001.
  5. Donden Y, Tshering G. An introduction to Tibetan medicine. New Delhi: Tibetan Review Publications, 1976.
  6. Ma B, Gao X, Hong Z. History of debate between traditional Chinese medicine and modern scientific medicine (Jindai Zhongxiyi Zhenglunshi). Hefei: Anhui Science and Technology Press, 1993.
  7. Cai J. A general history of Tibetan medicine (Zangyixue Tongshi). Xining: Qinghai People’s Press, 2002:54–70.
  8. Qiangbachilie. Tibetan medicine in China (Zhongguo de Zangyi). Beijing: Chinese Tibetan Study Press, 1996:1–18.
  9. Ga Z. The mystic culture of Tibetan Buddhism: Tantrism (Zangchuan Fujiao Shenmi Wenhua–Mizong). Lhasa: Tibetan People’s Press, 1996:156.
  10. 2001, J Altern Complement Med, 7, S33
  11. Tibetan Medicine Administration. Tibetan medicine (In Chinese. ) Lhasa: Tibetan People’s Press, 2003.

Cited by

See all 27

Metadata

Authors
Fan, R., & Holliday, I.
Affiliations
  • City University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Fan, Ruiping
Venue
Journal of Medical Ethics
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2007-07-30
Volume
33
Issue
8
Pages
454-461
ISSN
  • 0306-6800 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-4257
OpenAlex
W2069146397
Cited by
26
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
10.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Ethics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
traditional medicine, complementary and alternative medicine, medical integration, Tibetan medicine, Mongolian medicine, Uighur medicine, ideology of science, medical standards, healthcare policy, China, western China, integrative medicine
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Attitude to Health, China, Delivery of Health Care, Health Policy, Humans, Medicine, East Asian Traditional, Rural Health, Medical Laboratory Science

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.