Cited by 59Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalitiesGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersGenetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities

Int22h-1/int22h-2-mediated Xq28 rearrangements: intellectual disability associated with duplications and in utero male lethality with deletions

Open access
El-Hattab, Ayman W, Fang, Ping, Jin, Weihong, Hughes, Jeffrey R, Gibson, James B, Patel, Gayle S, Grange, Dorothy K, Manwaring, Linda P +3 more·2011·Journal of Medical Genetics

Abstract

Background: X linked intellectual disability (XLID) is common, with an estimated prevalence of 1/1000. The expanded use of array comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH) has led to the identification of several XLID-associated copy-number variants. Methods: Array CGH analysis was performed using chromosomal microarray with ∼105 000 oligonucleotides covering the entire genome. Confirmatory fluorescence in situ hybridisation analyses were subsequently performed. Chromosome X-inactivation (XCI) was assessed using methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme digestion followed by PCR amplification. Results: A novel ∼0.5 Mb duplication in Xq28 was identified in four cognitively impaired males who share behavioural abnormalities (hyperactivity and aggressiveness) and characteristic facial features (high forehead, upper eyelid fullness, broad nasal bridge and thick lower lip). These duplications were inherited from mothers with skewed XCI and are mediated by nonallelic homologous recombination between the low-copy repeat regions int22h-1 and int22h-2, which, in addition to int22h-3, are also responsible for inversions disrupting the factor VIII gene in haemophilia A. In addition, we have identified a reciprocal deletion in a girl and her mother, both of whom exhibit normal cognition and completely skewed XCI. The mother also had two spontaneous abortions. Conclusions: The phenotypic similarities among subjects with int22h-1/int22h-2-mediated Xq28 duplications suggest that such duplications are responsible for a novel XLID syndrome. The reciprocal deletion may not be associated with a clinical phenotype in carrier females due to skewed XCI, but may be lethal for males in utero. Advancements in array CGH technology have enabled the identification of such small, clinically relevant copy-number variants.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jmedgenet-2011-100125

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Vasquez AI, Rivera H, Bobadilla L, Crolla JA. A familial Xp+ chromosome, dup (Xq26.3qter). J Med Genet 1995;32:891e3.
  2. Goodman BK, Shaffer LG, Rutberg J, Leppert M, Harum K, Gagos S, Ray JH, Bialer MG, Zhou X, Pletcher BA, Shapira SK, Geraghty MT. Inherited duplication Xq27-qter at Xp22.3 in severely affected males: molecular cytogenetic evaluation and clinical description in three unrelated families. Am J Med Genet 1998;80:377e84.
  3. Carrel L, Willard HF. An assay for X inactivation based on differential methylation at the fragile X locus, FMR1. Am J Med Genet 1996;64:27e30.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
El-Hattab, A. W., Fang, P., Jin, W., Hughes, J. R., Gibson, J. B., Patel, G. S., Grange, D. K., Manwaring, L. P., Patel, A., Stankiewicz, P., & Cheung, S. W.
Affiliations
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
Cheung, Sau Wai
Venue
Journal of Medical Genetics
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2011-10-08
Volume
48
Issue
12
Pages
840-850
ISSN
  • 0022-2593 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-6244
OpenAlex
W2102033696
Cited by
59
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
Keywords
X-linked intellectual disability, Xq28 duplication, non-allelic homologous recombination, X-inactivation skewing, copy number variation, miscarriage, hyperactivity, aggression, facial dysmorphism
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Developmental Disabilities, Child, Preschool, Chromosome Deletion, Chromosome Mapping, Female, Hemophilia A, Humans, Male, Intellectual Disability, Pedigree, Phenotype, Sex Chromosome Aberrations, Genome, Human, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence, Computational Biology, Sex Chromosome Disorders, Chromosomes, Human, X, X Chromosome Inactivation, Comparative Genomic Hybridization, DNA Copy Number Variations, Segmental Duplications, Genomic, Chromosome Duplication, Homologous Recombination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review