The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Correlation of tumour BRAF mutations and MLH1 methylation with germline mismatch repair (MMR) gene mutation status: a literature review assessing utility of tumour features for MMR variant classification
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) that demonstrates microsatellite instability (MSI) is caused by either germline mismatch repair (MMR) gene mutations, or ‘sporadic’ somatic tumour MLH1 promoter methylation. MLH1 promoter methylation is reportedly correlated with tumour BRAF V600E mutation status. No systematic review has been undertaken to assess the value of BRAF V600E mutation and MLH1 promoter methylation tumour markers as negative predictors of germline MMR mutation status. A literature review of CRC cohorts tested for MMR mutations, and tumour BRAF V600E mutation and/or MLH1 promoter methylation was conducted using PubMed. Studies were assessed for tumour features, stratified by tumour MMR status based on immunohistochemistry or MSI where possible. Pooled frequencies and 95% CIs were calculated using a random effects model. BRAF V600E results for 4562 tumours from 35 studies, and MLH1 promoter methylation results for 2975 tumours from 43 studies, were assessed. In 550 MMR mutation carriers, the BRAF V600E mutation frequency was 1.40% (95% CI 0.06% to 3%). In MMR mutation-negative cases, the BRAF V600E mutation frequency was 5.00% (95% CI 4% to 7%) in 1623 microsatellite stable (MSS) cases and 63.50% (95% CI 47% to 79%) in 332 cases demonstrating MLH1 methylation or MLH1 expression loss. MLH1 promoter methylation of the ‘A region’ was reported more frequently than the ‘C region’ in MSS CRCs (17% vs 0.06%, p<0.0001) and in MLH1 mutation carriers (42% vs 6%, p<0.0001), but not in MMR mutation-negative MSI-H CRCs (40% vs 47%, p=0.12). Methylation of the ‘C region’ was a predictor of MMR mutation-negative status in MSI-H CRC cases (47% vs 6% in MLH1 mutation carriers, p<0.0001). This review demonstrates that tumour BRAF V600E mutation, and MLH1 promoter ‘C region’ methylation specifically, are strong predictors of negative MMR mutation status. It is important to incorporate these features in multifactorial models aimed at predicting MMR mutation status.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Brenner, H., Kloor, M., & Pox, C. P. (2014) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61649-9 · Cited by 2,762
Schmoll, H. J., Van Cutsem, E., Stein, A., Valentini, V., Glimelius, B., Haustermans, K., Nordlinger, B., van de Velde, C. J., Balmana, J., Regula, J., et al. (2012) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mds236 · Cited by 1,510
Molecular Pathways Involved in Colorectal Cancer: Implications for Disease Behavior and Prevention
Colussi, D., Brandi, G., Bazzoli, F., & Ricciardiello, L. (2013) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms140816365 · Cited by 429
The evolving role of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer: A review
Gelsomino, F., Barbolini, M., Spallanzani, A., Pugliese, G., & Cascinu, S. (2016) · Cancer Treatment Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2016.10.005 · Cited by 313
Viljoen, K. S., Dakshinamurthy, A., Goldberg, P., & Blackburn, J. M. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0119462 · Cited by 256
Metadata
- Authors
- Parsons, M. T., Buchanan, D. D., Thompson, B., Young, J. P., & Spurdle, A. B.
- Venue
- Journal of Medical Genetics
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2012-02-24
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 151-157
- ISSN
- 0022-2593 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-6244
- OpenAlex
- W2079530127
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Correlation of tumour BRAF mutations and MLH1 methylation with germline mismatch repair (MMR) gene mutation status: a literature review assessing utility of tumour features for MMR variant classification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/jmedgenet-2011-100714
- The paper
- Parsons, M. T., Buchanan, D. D., Thompson, B., Young, J. P., & Spurdle, A. B. (2012). Correlation of tumour BRAF mutations and MLH1 methylation with germline mismatch repair (MMR) gene mutation status: a literature review assessing utility of tumour features for MMR variant classification. Journal of Medical Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2011-100714
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.