Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 438

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinical application of exome sequencing in undiagnosed genetic conditions

Open access
Need, Anna C, Shashi, Vandana, Hitomi, Yuki, Schoch, Kelly, Shianna, Kevin V, McDonald, Marie T, Meisler, Miriam H, Goldstein, David B·2012·Journal of Medical Genetics

Abstract

Background: There is considerable interest in the use of next-generation sequencing to help diagnose unidentified genetic conditions, but it is difficult to predict the success rate in a clinical setting that includes patients with a broad range of phenotypic presentations. Methods: The authors present a pilot programme of whole-exome sequencing on 12 patients with unexplained and apparent genetic conditions, along with their unaffected parents. Unlike many previous studies, the authors did not seek patients with similar phenotypes, but rather enrolled any undiagnosed proband with an apparent genetic condition when predetermined criteria were met. Results: This undertaking resulted in a likely genetic diagnosis in 6 of the 12 probands, including the identification of apparently causal mutations in four genes known to cause Mendelian disease ( TCF4, EFTUD2, SCN2A and SMAD4 ) and one gene related to known Mendelian disease genes ( NGLY1 ). Of particular interest is that at the time of this study, EFTUD2 was not yet known as a Mendelian disease gene but was nominated as a likely cause based on the observation of de novo mutations in two unrelated probands. In a seventh case with multiple disparate clinical features, the authors were able to identify homozygous mutations in EFEMP1 as a likely cause for macular degeneration (though likely not for other features). Conclusions: This study provides evidence that next-generation sequencing can have high success rates in a clinical setting, but also highlights key challenges. It further suggests that the presentation of known Mendelian conditions may be considerably broader than currently recognised.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jmedgenet-2012-100819

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 438

Metadata

Authors
Need, A. C., Shashi, V., Hitomi, Y., Schoch, K., Shianna, K. V., McDonald, M. T., Meisler, M. H., & Goldstein, D. B.
Venue
Journal of Medical Genetics
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2012-05-11
Volume
49
Issue
6
Pages
353-361
ISSN
  • 0022-2593 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-6244
OpenAlex
W2153384396
Cited by
438
References
4
FWCI
30.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical application of exome sequencing in undiagnosed genetic conditions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/jmedgenet-2012-100819
The paper
Need, A. C., Shashi, V., Hitomi, Y., Schoch, K., Shianna, K. V., McDonald, M. T., Meisler, M. H., & Goldstein, D. B. (2012). Clinical application of exome sequencing in undiagnosed genetic conditions. Journal of Medical Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2012-100819

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.