Cited by 33Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Functional interaction between APOE4 and LDL receptor isoforms in Alzheimer's disease

Open access
Cheng, D, Huang, R, Lanham, I S, Cathcart, H M, Howard, M, Corder, E H, Poduslo, S E·2005·Journal of Medical Genetics

Abstract

Background: Multiple genes have been provisionally associated with Alzheimer’s disease, including the coding polymorphisms in exons 8 and 13 in the low density lipoprotein receptor gene (LDLR), situated on chromosome 19p13.2. Methods: The sample groups consisted of 180 AD patients and 141 control spouses. We carried out genotyping of LDLR8 and LDLR13. Results: The LDLR8 GG genotype was common, found in 84% of the unaffected control subjects and 91% of the AD patients in our study. There was a ninefold elevation in risk associated with GG:CC versus A– and T– among APOE4+ subjects when compared with APOE4− subjects (odds ratio 9.3; 95% confidence interval 1.8 to 48.2). With the additional information on LDLR polymorphism, we defined an overall 12 fold elevation in risk for APOE4 in combination with LDLR GG:CC (11.9; 2.8 to 50.0; Fisher’s exact test, p = 0.0002; standard power 0.999), compared with other subjects lacking all three of these polymorphisms. Conclusion: These results imply a functional interaction between ApoE and LDL receptor proteins that determines risk for Alzheimer’s disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jmg.2004.024968

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several groups identified a potential contribution of LDLR to AD and investigated potential links, with some apparently opposing results.

    “Several groups identified a potential contribution of LDLR to AD and investigated potential links, for example by crossing AD transgenic mice with the LDLR−/− mouse model of hypercholesterolemia to investigate the effects of LDLR deficiency [30]–[40]. Some apparently opposing results were obtained.”

    From LDLR Expression and Localization Are Altered in Mouse and Human Cell Culture Models of Alzheimer's Disease (2010) · cites this paper as [33]

    The Discussion reports an earlier study finding no association between two LDLR polymorphisms and late-onset AD, while the paper's own results associate an LDLR genotype combination with increased AD risk in APOE4 carriers. This supports investigation of a potential LDLR–AD link and apparently differing findings. The cited paper studies human genotypes, however; it does not report crossing AD transgenic mice with LDLR-deficient mice, the example included in the cited sentence. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A functional interaction between apoE and LDLR is a potential mechanism to explain the apoE isoform-dependent disease risks associated with both CVD and AD.

    “Together with epidemiological studies (Cheng et al., 2005, Gopalraj et al., 2005, Retz et al., 2001, Vermissen et al., 2011, Zou et al., 2008), these data point toward a functional interaction between apoE and LDLR as a potential mechanism to explain the apoE isoform-dependent disease risks associated with both CVD and AD.”

    From Apolipoprotein E–low density lipoprotein receptor interaction affects spatial memory retention and brain ApoE levels in an isoform-dependent manner (2014) · cites this paper as Cheng et al., 2005

    The Abstract concludes that the results imply a functional interaction between ApoE and LDL receptor proteins affecting Alzheimer’s disease (AD) risk, and the Discussion proposes that particular combinations may modify that risk. The paper discusses cholesterol metabolism but does not connect the interaction to cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, so it supports the AD portion, not the claim about both diseases. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Several studies reported that a few single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in LDLR gene are associated with the risk of developing AD in case-control studies.

    “Several studies reported that a few single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in LDLR gene are associated with the risk of developing AD in case-control studies (Cheng et al., 2005; Gopalraj et al., 2005; Retz et al., 2001).”
  • Polymorphisms in LDLR exon 8 and exon 13 present in conjunction with an ε4 allele increase AD risk.

    “Furthermore, studies by Retz et al. (2001) and Cheng et al. (2005) demonstrated an increase in AD risk when polymorphisms in LDLR exon 8 and exon 13 were present in conjunction with an ε4 allele.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. 10.1126/science.8346443 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1001/jama.1997.03550160069041 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1126/science.3283935 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1161/01.ATV.0000094963.07902.FB · DOI · Paper page
  5. 2004, J Lipid Res, 45, 403, 10.1194/jlr.R300017-JLR200 · DOI
  6. 10.1002/humu.1380010602 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 2000, Biochim Biophys Acta, 1529, 287, 10.1016/S1388-1981(00)00155-4 · DOI
  8. 10.1097/00041444-200109000-00002 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 1995, Clin Genet, 47, 68, 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1995.tb03926.x · DOI
  10. 1989, S Afr Med J, 76, 402
  11. 1994, Arterioscler Thromb, 14, 663, 10.1161/01.ATV.14.5.663 · DOI
  12. 10.1136/jmg.40.6.424 · DOI
  13. 10.1159/000053076 · DOI
  14. 10.1093/hmg/ddh119 · DOI
  15. 10.1212/WNL.45.6.1092 · DOI
  16. 10.1212/WNL.34.7.939 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 2003, Genetics, 164, 1567, 10.1093/genetics/164.4.1567 · DOI
  18. 10.1023/A:1022409617539 · DOI
  19. 10.1086/383282 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cheng, D., Huang, R., Lanham, I. S., Cathcart, H. M., Howard, M., Corder, E. H., & Poduslo, S. E.
Affiliations
  • Augusta University (US)
  • Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Poduslo, S E
Venue
Journal of Medical Genetics
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2005-02
Volume
42
Issue
2
Pages
129-131
ISSN
  • 0022-2593 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-6244
OpenAlex
W2026895373
Cited by
33
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (U24 AG21886, U24AG021886)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, APOE ε4, LDL receptor, genetic risk, gene-gene interaction, lipid metabolism
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Apolipoproteins E, Female, Genotype, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Polymorphism, Genetic, Receptors, LDL, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Protein Isoforms, Apolipoprotein E4

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review