Cited by 106Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Lack of LDL receptor aggravates learning deficits and amyloid deposits in Alzheimer transgenic mice

Cao, Dongfeng, Fukuchi, Ken-ichiro, Wan, Hongquan, Kim, Helen, Li, Ling·2006·Neurobiology of Aging

Abstract

Emerging evidence indicates that cholesterol metabolism affects the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). The LDL receptor (LDLR) is obligatory in maintaining cholesterol homeostasis in the periphery. To investigate the role of LDLR in the development of AD-like behavior and pathology, Tg2576 mice, a well-characterized transgenic mouse model of AD, with different genotypes of LDLR were generated. Here we show that LDLR-deficient Tg2576 mice developed hypercholesterolemia and age-dependent cerebral beta-amyloidosis. Before the manifestation of amyloid-beta (Abeta) deposition, these mice displayed hyperactivity, reduced anxiety, and impaired spatial learning regardless of LDLR genotypes. After the manifestation of Abeta deposition, LDLR-deficient Tg2576 mice showed more spatial learning deficits than LDLR-intact Tg2576 mice. Although LDLR genotypes did not affect the expression level of the amyloid-beta precursor protein transgene, there was a significant increase in Abeta deposition accompanied with an increase of apoE expression in LDLR-deficient Tg2576 mice. Our results suggest that the LDLR plays a role in the development of Alzheimer-type learning impairment and amyloidosis and can be a novel therapeutic target for AD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2005.09.011

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cao, D., Fukuchi, K.-I., Wan, H., Kim, H., & Li, L.
Affiliations
University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Corresponding author
Li, Ling
Venue
Neurobiology of Aging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-11
Volume
27
Issue
11
Pages
1632-1643
ISSN
0197-4580 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2098796119
Cited by
106
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 9
FWCI
3.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Heart Association
  • University of Minnesota
  • National Institute on Aging (R21AG025949, AG025949)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS 43947, R01NS043947)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
LDL receptor, Alzheimer's disease, Tg2576 mice, amyloid-beta deposition, hypercholesterolemia, spatial learning deficits, cholesterol metabolism, apolipoprotein E, amyloid precursor protein, anxiety, hyperactivity, therapeutic target
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Amyloidosis, Animals, Cholesterol, Disease Models, Animal, Female, Hypercholesterolemia, Male, Memory, Mice, Transgenic, Receptors, LDL, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Maze Learning, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review