The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sotos syndrome: a study of the diagnostic criteria and natural history.
Open accessAbstract
Seventy-nine patients with a provisional diagnosis of Sotos syndrome were clinically assessed, and their photographs between the ages of 1 and 6 years evaluated. These photographs, together with photographs of first degree relatives, also at ages 1 to 6 years, were reviewed by four clinical geneticists. Forty-one probands (but no first degree relatives) were identified in whom the facial gestalt was thought to be characteristic of Sotos syndrome. Comparison of anthropometric measurements, bone age, and developmental delay in these 41 probands showed marked differences between them and the remaining 38 probands, and allowed the formulation of guidelines for the diagnosis of Sotos syndrome. Length was identified as the most significantly increased prenatal parameter. In childhood occipitofrontal head circumference (OFC), height, and weight were all increased. OFC remained above the 97th centile in all but one case throughout childhood and adulthood, whereas height and weight had a tendency to return towards the mean. This 'normalisation' was more pronounced in females and was probably related to their early puberty. Early developmental delay and an advanced bone age, seen in 100% and 84% respectively of study cases, may be invariable in Sotos syndrome, but selection bias and limited data prevented confirmation of this supposition. The authors suggest that facial gestalt, growth pattern, bone age, and developmental delay are the major diagnostic criteria. Using these criteria, no affected first degree relatives were identified. There were few long term medical complications in the probands, but behavioural difficulties caused considerable parental concern.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Douglas, J., Hanks, S., Temple, I. K., Davies, S., Murray, A., Upadhyaya, M., Tomkins, S., Hughes, H. E., Trevor Cole, R. P., & Rahman, N. (2003) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/345647 · Cited by 301
Self-citationRisk of tumorigenesis in overgrowth syndromes: a comprehensive review
Lapunzina, P. (2005) · American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C Seminars in Medical Genetics · doi:10.1002/ajmg.c.30064 · Cited by 276
Weksberg, R., Shuman, C., & Smith, A. C. (2005) · American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C Seminars in Medical Genetics · doi:10.1002/ajmg.c.30058 · Cited by 307
Metadata
- Authors
- Cole, T. R., & Hughes, H. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Medical Genetics
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1994-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 20-32
- ISSN
- 0022-2593 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-6244
- OpenAlex
- W2043714662
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sotos syndrome: a study of the diagnostic criteria and natural history. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/jmg.31.1.20
- The paper
- Cole, T. R., & Hughes, H. E. (1994). Sotos syndrome: a study of the diagnostic criteria and natural history. Journal of Medical Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1136/jmg.31.1.20
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.