The DOI matches its Crossref record.
New criteria for improved diagnosis of Bardet-Biedl syndrome: results of a population survey
Open accessAbstract
Bardet-Biedl syndrome (BBS) is an autosomal recessive condition characterised by rod-cone dystrophy, postaxial polydactyly, central obesity, mental retardation, hypogonadism, and renal dysfunction. BBS expression varies both within and between families and diagnosis is often difficult. We sought to define the condition more clearly by studying 109 BBS patients and their families, the largest population surveyed to date. The average age at diagnosis was 9 years, which is late for such a debilitating condition, but the slow development of the clinical features of BBS probably accounts for this. Postaxial polydactyly had been present in 69% of patients at birth, but obesity had only begun to develop at around 2-3 years, and retinal degeneration had not become apparent until a mean age of 8.5 years. Our study identified some novel clinical features, including neurological, speech, and language deficits, behavioural traits, facial dysmorphism, and dental anomalies. In the light of these features we propose a revision of the diagnostic criteria, which may facilitate earlier diagnosis of this disorder. We present evidence for an overlapping phenotype with the Laurence-Moon syndrome and propose a unifying, descriptive label be adopted (polydactyly-obesity-kidney-eye syndrome). We report an increased prevalence of renal malformations and renal cell carcinoma in the unaffected relatives of BBS patients and suggest that these may be a consequence of heterozygosity for BBS genes. Our findings have important implications for the care of BBS patients and their unaffected relatives.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hartong, D. T., Berson, E. L., & Dryja, T. P. (2006) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69740-7 · Cited by 2,924
Hamel, C. (2006) · Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases · doi:10.1186/1750-1172-1-40 · Cited by 962
Ciliopathies: an expanding disease spectrum
Waters, A. M., & Beales, P. L. (2011) · Pediatric Nephrology · doi:10.1007/s00467-010-1731-7 · Cited by 676
Self-citationClinical Diagnostics in Human Genetics with Semantic Similarity Searches in Ontologies
Köhler, S., Schulz, M. H., Krawitz, P., Bauer, S., Dölken, S., Ott, C. E., Mundlos, C., Horn, D., Mundlos, S., & Robinson, P. N. (2009) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.09.003 · Cited by 590
TTC21B contributes both causal and modifying alleles across the ciliopathy spectrum
Program, N. C. S., Davis, E. E., Zhang, Q., Liu, Q., Diplas, B. H., Davey, L. M., Hartley, J., Stoetzel, C., Szymanska, K., Ramaswami, G., et al. (2011) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.756 · Cited by 370
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Beales, P. L., Elcioglu, N., Woolf, A. S., Parker, D., & Flinter, F. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Medical Genetics
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1999-06-01
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 437-446
- ISSN
- 0022-2593 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-6244
- OpenAlex
- W2158501174
- Cited by
- 969
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New criteria for improved diagnosis of Bardet-Biedl syndrome: results of a population survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/jmg.36.6.437
- The paper
- Beales, P. L., Elcioglu, N., Woolf, A. S., Parker, D., & Flinter, F. A. (1999). New criteria for improved diagnosis of Bardet-Biedl syndrome: results of a population survey. Journal of Medical Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1136/jmg.36.6.437
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.