Improved detection of cortical MS lesions with phase-sensitive inversion recovery MRI
Abstract
Objective Cortical grey matter lesions are common in multiple sclerosis (MS), but usually not seen on MRI. The authors compared the performance of double inversion recovery (DIR, currently considered the best available imaging sequence for detecting cortical lesions) with phase-sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR, a sequence allowing much higher resolution scans to be obtained in a clinically feasible time). Methods Sixty MS patients and 30 healthy controls underwent MRI scanning on a 3 Tesla scanner. The authors compared intracortical (IC) and leucocortical (LC) lesion counts obtained with a standard DIR sequence (1×1×3 mm resolution, obtained in 4 min) and a PSIR sequence (0.5×0.5×2 mm, 11 min). Lesions were marked separately on DIR and PSIR scans. Results In the whole MS cohort, more cortical lesions were seen on the higher-resolution PSIR than the DIR scans (IC mean±SD: 18.1±9.8 vs 5.9±4.5, p Conclusions Compared with DIR, using PSIR the authors are able to detect a significantly greater number of cortical grey matter lesions. The presence of at least one IC lesion in every MS patient, but very few healthy controls, suggests that it may be a useful adjunct to conventional MRI when a diagnosis of MS is suspected but not confirmed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cortical lesions are better seen using double inversion recovery (DIR) or phase-sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR) techniques.
“are better seen using double inversion recovery (DIR) or phase-sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR) techniques.73,75”
From Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: progress and challenges (2017) · cites this paper as [75]
Cortical lesions are rarely visualised on conventional MRI sequences.
“cortical lesions are rarely visualised on conventional MRI sequences”
From Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: progress and challenges (2017) · cites this paper as [75]
Cites
Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: An expanded disability status scale (EDSS)
Kurtzke, J. F. (1983) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.33.11.1444 · Cited by 15,011 · see citing works
Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria
Polman, C. H., Reingold, S. C., Banwell, B., Clanet, M., Cohen, J. A., Filippi, M., Fujihara, K., Havrdova, E., Hutchinson, M., Kappos, L., et al. (2011) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.22366 · Cited by 9,802 · see citing works
Inflammatory cortical demyelination in early multiple sclerosis.
Lucchinetti, C. F., Popescu, B. F. G., Bunyan, R. F., Moll, N. M., Roemer, S. F., Lassmann, H., Brück, W., Parisi, J. E., Scheithauer, B. W., Giannini, C., et al. (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1100648 · Cited by 1,103 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: progress and challenges
Brownlee, W. J., Hardy, T. A., Fazekas, F., & Miller, D. H. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)30959-x · Cited by 701 · see citing works
Self-citationSpinal cord MRI in multiple sclerosis—diagnostic, prognostic and clinical value
Kearney, H., Miller, D. H., & Ciccarelli, O. (2015) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2015.80 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Sethi, V., Yousry, T. A., Muhlert, N., Ron, M., Golay, X., Wheeler-Kingshott, C., Miller, D. H., & Chard, D. T.
- Affiliations
- National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Sethi, Varun
- Venue
- Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2012-07-17
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 877-882
- ISSN
- 0022-3050 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-330X
- OpenAlex
- W2160923599
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 10.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- multiple sclerosis, phase-sensitive inversion recovery, double inversion recovery, intracortical lesions, lesion detection, MS diagnosis
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Cerebral Cortex, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Case-Control Studies, Nerve Fibers, Unmyelinated, Neuroimaging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review