Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 178

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Efficacy and safety of natalizumab in multiple sclerosis: interim observational programme results

Open access
Butzkueven, H., Kappos, L., Pellegrini, F., Trojano, M., Wiendl, H., Patel, R. N., Zhang, A., Hotermans, C., Belachew, S., on behalf of the TYSABRI Observational Program (TOP) Investigators·2014·Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials established the efficacy and safety of natalizumab. Data are needed over longer periods of time and in the clinical practice setting. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate long-term safety of natalizumab and its impact on annualised relapse rate and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) progression in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). METHODS: The Tysabri (natalizumab) Observational Program (TOP) is an open-label, multinational, 10-year prospective study in clinical practice settings. RESULTS: In this 5-year interim analysis, 4821 patients were enrolled. Follow-up for at least 4 years from natalizumab commencement in 468 patients and at least 2 years in 2496 patients revealed no new safety signals. There were 18 cases of progressive multifocal leucoencephalopathy reported, following 11-44 natalizumab infusions. Mean annualised relapse rate decreased from 1.99 in the 12 months prior to baseline to 0.31 on natalizumab therapy (p<0.0001), remaining low at 5 years. Lower annualised relapse rates were observed in patients who used natalizumab as first MS therapy, in patients with lower baseline EDSS scores, and in patients with lower prenatalizumab relapse rates. Mean EDSS scores remained unchanged up to 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Interim TOP data confirm natalizumab's overall safety profile and the low relapse rate and stabilised disability levels in natalizumab-treated patients with RRMS in clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00493298.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jnnp-2013-306936

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 178

Metadata

Authors
Butzkueven, H., Kappos, L., Pellegrini, F., Trojano, M., Wiendl, H., Patel, R. N., Zhang, A., Hotermans, C., Belachew, S., & on behalf of the TYSABRI Observational Program (TOP) Investigators
Venue
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2014-02-14
Volume
85
Issue
11
Pages
1190-1197
ISSN
0022-3050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2105159132
Cited by
178
References
0
FWCI
16.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficacy and safety of natalizumab in multiple sclerosis: interim observational programme results. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/jnnp-2013-306936
The paper
Butzkueven, H., Kappos, L., Pellegrini, F., Trojano, M., Wiendl, H., Patel, R. N., Zhang, A., Hotermans, C., Belachew, S., & on behalf of the TYSABRI Observational Program (TOP) Investigators. (2014). Efficacy and safety of natalizumab in multiple sclerosis: interim observational programme results. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2013-306936

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.