The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Efficacy and safety of natalizumab in multiple sclerosis: interim observational programme results
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Clinical trials established the efficacy and safety of natalizumab. Data are needed over longer periods of time and in the clinical practice setting. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate long-term safety of natalizumab and its impact on annualised relapse rate and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) progression in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). METHODS: The Tysabri (natalizumab) Observational Program (TOP) is an open-label, multinational, 10-year prospective study in clinical practice settings. RESULTS: In this 5-year interim analysis, 4821 patients were enrolled. Follow-up for at least 4 years from natalizumab commencement in 468 patients and at least 2 years in 2496 patients revealed no new safety signals. There were 18 cases of progressive multifocal leucoencephalopathy reported, following 11-44 natalizumab infusions. Mean annualised relapse rate decreased from 1.99 in the 12 months prior to baseline to 0.31 on natalizumab therapy (p<0.0001), remaining low at 5 years. Lower annualised relapse rates were observed in patients who used natalizumab as first MS therapy, in patients with lower baseline EDSS scores, and in patients with lower prenatalizumab relapse rates. Mean EDSS scores remained unchanged up to 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Interim TOP data confirm natalizumab's overall safety profile and the low relapse rate and stabilised disability levels in natalizumab-treated patients with RRMS in clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00493298.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kobayashi, T., Siegmund, B., Le Berre, C., Wei, S. C., Ferrante, M., Shen, B., Bernstein, C. N., Danese, S., Peyrin-Biroulet, L., & Hibi, T. (2020) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/s41572-020-0205-x · Cited by 1,649
Plavina, T., Subramanyam, M., Bloomgren, G., Richman, S., Pace, A., Lee, S., Schlain, B., Campagnolo, D., Belachew, S., & Ticho, B. (2014) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.24286 · Cited by 438
Self-citationAlemtuzumab CARE-MS II 5-year follow-up: Efficacy and safety findings
Coles, A. J., Cohen, J. A., Fox, E. J., Giovannoni, G., Hartung, H.-P., Havrdova, E., Schippling, S., Selmaj, K. W., Traboulsee, A., Compston, D. A. S., et al. (2017) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000004354 · Cited by 277
Alemtuzumab CARE-MS I 5-year follow-up: Durable efficacy in the absence of continuous MS therapy
Havrdova, E., Arnold, D. L., Cohen, J. A., Hartung, H.-P., Fox, E. J., Giovannoni, G., Schippling, S., Selmaj, K. W., Traboulsee, A., Compston, D. A. S., et al. (2017) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000004313 · Cited by 221
Clarke, M. A., Samaraweera, A. P., Falah, Y., Pitiot, A., Allen, C. M., Dineen, R. A., Tench, C. R., Morgan, P. S., & Evangelou, N. (2020) · Multiple Sclerosis Journal · doi:10.1177/1352458519882282 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Butzkueven, H., Kappos, L., Pellegrini, F., Trojano, M., Wiendl, H., Patel, R. N., Zhang, A., Hotermans, C., Belachew, S., & on behalf of the TYSABRI Observational Program (TOP) Investigators
- Venue
- Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2014-02-14
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1190-1197
- ISSN
- 0022-3050 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2105159132
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficacy and safety of natalizumab in multiple sclerosis: interim observational programme results. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/jnnp-2013-306936
- The paper
- Butzkueven, H., Kappos, L., Pellegrini, F., Trojano, M., Wiendl, H., Patel, R. N., Zhang, A., Hotermans, C., Belachew, S., & on behalf of the TYSABRI Observational Program (TOP) Investigators. (2014). Efficacy and safety of natalizumab in multiple sclerosis: interim observational programme results. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2013-306936
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.