The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Establishing pathological cut-offs of brain atrophy rates in multiple sclerosis
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether it is feasible to establish specific cut-off values able to discriminate 'physiological' or 'pathological' brain volume rates in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: The study was based on the analysis of longitudinal MRI data sets of patients with MS (n=206, 87% relapsing-remitting, 7% secondary progressive and 6% primary progressive) and healthy controls (HC; n=35). Brain atrophy rates were computed over a mean follow-up of 7.5 years (range 1-12) for patients with MS and 6.3 years (range 1-12.5) for HC with the SIENA software and expressed as annualised per cent brain volume change (PBVC/y). A weighted (on the follow-up length) receiver operating characteristic analysis and the area under the curve (AUC) were used for statistics. RESULTS: The weighted PBVC/y was -0.51±0.27% in patients with MS and -0.27±0.15% in HC (p<0.0001). There was a significant age-related difference in PBVC/y between HC older and younger than 35 years of age (p=0.02), but not in patients with MS (p=0.8). The cut-off of PBVC/y, as measured by SIENA that could maximise the accuracy in discriminating patients with MS from HC, was -0.37%, with 67% sensitivity and 80% specificity. According to the observed distribution, values of PBVC/y as measured by SIENA that could define a pathological range were above -0.52% with 95% specificity, above -0.46% with 90% specificity and above -0.40% with 80% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: Our evidence-based criteria provide values able to discriminate the presence or absence of 'pathological' brain volume loss in MS with high specificity. Such results could be of great value in a clinical setting, particularly in assessing treatment efficacy in MS.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: An expanded disability status scale (EDSS)
Kurtzke, J. F. (1983) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.33.11.1444 · Cited by 15,011
Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL
Smith, S. M., Jenkinson, M., Woolrich, M. W., Beckmann, C. F., Behrens, T. E. J., Johansen-Berg, H., Bannister, P. R., De Luca, M., Drobnjak, I., Flitney, D. E., et al. (2004) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051 · Cited by 13,630
Jenkinson, M., Beckmann, C. F., Behrens, T. E. J., Woolrich, M. W., & Smith, S. M. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.015 · Cited by 11,314
Axonal transection in the lesions of multiple sclerosis
Trapp, B. D., Peterson, J., Ransohoff, R. M., Rudick, R., Mörk, S., & Bö, L. (1998) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199801293380502 · Cited by 4,029
Accurate, Robust, and Automated Longitudinal and Cross-Sectional Brain Change Analysis
Smith, S. M., Zhang, Y., Jenkinson, M., Chen, J., Matthews, P. M., Federico, A., & De Stefano, N. (2002) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1040 · Cited by 2,013
Self-citationAssociation between pathological and MRI findings in multiple sclerosis
Filippi, M., Rocca, M. A., Barkhof, F., Brück, W., Chen, J. T., Comi, G., DeLuca, G., De Stefano, N., Erickson, B. J., Evangelou, N., et al. (2012) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(12)70003-0 · Cited by 486
Self-citationHedman, A. M., van Haren, N. E. M., Schnack, H. G., Kahn, R. S., & Hulshoff Pol, H. E. (2012) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.21334 · Cited by 484
The measurement and clinical relevance of brain atrophy in multiple sclerosis
Bermel, R. A., & Bakshi, R. (2006) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(06)70349-0 · Cited by 456
Risk factors for progression of brain atrophy in aging: Six-year follow-up of normal subjects
Enzinger, C., Fazekas, F., Matthews, P. M., Ropele, S., Schmidt, H., Smith, S., & Schmidt, R. (2005) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000161871.83614.bb · Cited by 404
Evangelou, N. (2001) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/124.9.1813 · Cited by 323
Cited by
Ageing, Cellular Senescence and Neurodegenerative Disease
Kritsilis, M., V. Rizou, S., Koutsoudaki, P. N., Evangelou, K., Gorgoulis, V. G., & Papadopoulos, D. (2018) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms19102937 · Cited by 448
Cellular Senescence in Neurodegenerative Diseases
Martínez-Cué, C., & Rueda, N. (2020) · Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncel.2020.00016 · Cited by 281
Metadata
- Authors
- De Stefano, N., Stromillo, M. L., Giorgio, A., Bartolozzi, M. L., Battaglini, M., Baldini, M., Portaccio, E., Amato, M. P., & Sormani, M. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2015-04-22
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- jnnp-2014-309903
- ISSN
- 0022-3050 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-330X
- OpenAlex
- W2123968065
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 19.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Establishing pathological cut-offs of brain atrophy rates in multiple sclerosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/jnnp-2014-309903
- The paper
- De Stefano, N., Stromillo, M. L., Giorgio, A., Bartolozzi, M. L., Battaglini, M., Baldini, M., Portaccio, E., Amato, M. P., & Sormani, M. P. (2015). Establishing pathological cut-offs of brain atrophy rates in multiple sclerosis. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2014-309903
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.