Cited by 209Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchNeurogenetic and Muscular Disorders ResearchAmyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes

Rate of disease progression: A prognostic biomarker in ALS

Open access
Labra, Julie, Menon, Parvathi, Byth, Karen, Morrison, Shea, Vucic, Steve·2016·Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the utility of rate of disease progression (ΔFS) as a prognostic biomarker in amyotrophic laterals sclerosis (ALS). METHODS: A total of 203 patients with ALS were prospectively recruited over a 10-year period. At initial visit, the following variables were collected: demographic details, symptom duration, site of onset, phenotype, riluzole use and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) scores. The ΔFS score at initial visit was calculated by dividing the ALSFRS-R total score by symptom duration (months). The primary end point was survival. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to illustrate the distribution of survival from a specified point, while multiple Cox proportional hazards modelling with backward stepwise variable selection was used to identify the independent predictors of survival at initial visit. RESULTS: The ΔFS score at initial visit was a significant predictor of survival in ALS (p<0.001), and remained significant when adjusted for age and site of onset (p<0.001). 3 prognostic subgroups emerged, with a ΔFS score of <0.47 associated with a median survival of 2.4 years, which was significantly greater when compared with an initial ΔFS score of between 0.47 and 1.11 (1.6 years, p<0.05) and a score >1.11 (0.7 years, p<0.001). Importantly, multiple Cox proportional hazards modelling identified ΔFS as a highly significant independent predictor of survival in ALS (p<0.001) along with site of disease onset (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Rate of disease progression appears to be a simple and sensitive clinical prognostic biomarker in ALS that could be potentially utilised in clinical practice and future therapeutic trials.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jnnp-2015-310998

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Turner MR, Kiernan MC, Leigh PN, et al. Biomarkers in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Lancet Neurol 2009;8:94-109. · DOI
  2. Chio A. ISIS Survey: an international study on the diagnostic process and its implications in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol 1999;246(Suppl 3):1-5. · DOI
  3. Mandrioli J, Faglioni P, Nichelli P, et al. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: prognostic indicators of survival. Amyotroph Lat Scler 2006;7:217-26. · DOI
  4. Desport JC, Torny F, Lacoste M, et al. Hypermetabolism in ALS: correlations with clinical and paraclinical parameters. Neurodegener Dis 2005;2:202-7. · DOI
  5. Lee JR-J, Annegers JF, Appel SH. Prognosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and the effect of referral selection. J Neurol Sci 1995;132:207-15. · DOI
  6. Gordon PH, Salachas F, Lacomblez L, et al. Predicting survival of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis at presentation: a 15-year experience. Neurodegener Dis 2013;12:81-90. · DOI
  7. Zoccolella S, Beghi E, Palagano G, et al. Analysis of survival and prognostic factors in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a population based study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008;79:33-7. · DOI
  8. Kimura F, Fujimura C, Ishida S, et al. Progression rate of ALSFRS-R at time of diagnosis predicts survival time in ALS. Neurology 2006;66:265-7. · DOI
  9. Gordon PH, Cheung YK. Progression rate of ALSFRS-R at time of diagnosis predicts survival time in ALS. Neurology 2006;67:1314-15. · DOI
  10. Kiernan MC, Talman P, Henderson RD, et al. Establishment of an Australian motor neurone disease registry. Med J Aust 2006;184:367-8.
  11. Brooks B, Miller R, Swash M, et al. El Escorial revisited: revised criteria for the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord 2000;1:293-9. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Traynor BJ, Alexander M, Corr B, et al. Effect of a multidisciplinary amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) clinic on ALS survival: a population based study, 1996-2000. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003;74:1258-61. · DOI
  13. Vucic S, Rothstein JD, Kiernan MC. Advances in treating amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: insights from pathophysiological studies. Trends Neurosci 2014;37:433-42. · DOI
  14. Nicholson K, Cudkowicz M, Berry J. Clinical trial designs in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: does one design fit all? Neurotherapeutics 2015;12:376-83. · DOI
  15. Czaplinski A, Yen AA, Appel SH. Forced vital capacity (FVC) as an indicator of survival and disease progression in an ALS clinic population. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2006;77:390-2. · DOI
  16. Eisen A, Kiernan M, Mitsumoto H, et al. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a long preclinical period? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2014;85:1232-8. · DOI
  17. Aggarwal A, Nicholson G. Detection of preclinical motor neurone loss in SOD1 mutation carriers using motor unit number estimation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002;73:199-201. · DOI
  18. de Carvalho M, Swash M. The onset of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2006;77:388-9. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Labra, J., Menon, P., Byth, K., Morrison, S., & Vucic, S.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Vucic, Steve
Venue
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2015-07-07
Volume
87
Issue
6
Pages
628-632
ISSN
  • 0022-3050 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-330X
OpenAlex
W2308131719
Cited by
209
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11
FWCI
9.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Motor Neurone Disease Research Institute of Australia
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
Keywords
amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, prognostic factors, survival prediction, ALSFRS-R, symptom duration, riluzole, prognostic subgroups
MeSH terms
Intersectoral Collaboration, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Biomarkers, Proportional Hazards Models, Disease Progression, Interdisciplinary Communication, Kaplan-Meier Estimate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review