Long-term deep brain stimulation of the ventral anterior limb of the internal capsule for treatment-resistant depression
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) reduces depressive symptoms in approximately 40%-60% of patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD), but data on long-term efficacy and safety are scarce. Our objective was to assess the efficacy and safety of DBS targeted at the ventral anterior limb of the internal capsule (vALIC) in 25 patients with TRD during a 1-year, open-label, maintenance period, which followed a 1-year optimisation period. METHODS: Depression severity was measured using the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D-17), Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and self-reported Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS-SR). Primary outcomes were response rate (≥50% HAM-D-17 score reduction) after the maintenance phase, approximately 2 years after DBS surgery, and changes in depression scores and occurrence of adverse events during the maintenance phase. RESULTS: Of 25 operated patients, 21 entered and 18 completed the maintenance phase. After the maintenance phase, eight patients were classified as responder (observed response rate: 44.4%; intention-to-treat: 32.0%). During the maintenance phase, HAM-D-17 and MADRS scores did not change, but the mean IDS-SR score decreased from 38.8 (95% CI 31.2 to 46.5) to 35.0 (95% CI 26.1 to 43.8) (p=0.008). Non-responders after optimisation did not improve during the maintenance phase. Four non-DBS-related serious adverse events occurred, including one suicide attempt. CONCLUSIONS: vALIC DBS for TRD showed continued efficacy 2 years after surgery, with symptoms remaining stable after optimisation as rated by clinicians and with patient ratings improving. This supports DBS as a viable treatment option for patients with TRD. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR2118.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the Van der Wal et al 2020 open-label study of 18 patients with treatment-resistant depression, ventral capsule/ventral striatum deep brain stimulation yielded a 27.8% remission rate at 24 months, measured by HDRS.
“| | Van der Wal et al | 2020 Open label | N = 18 | 24 | 44.4% | 27.8% | HDRS |”
From Deep brain stimulation for depression. (2022) · cites this paper as [62]
In the Van der Wal et al 2020 open-label study of 18 patients with treatment-resistant depression, ventral capsule/ventral striatum deep brain stimulation yielded a 44.4% response rate at 24 months, measured by HDRS.
“| | Van der Wal et al | 2020 Open label | N = 18 | 24 | 44.4% | 27.8% | HDRS |”
From Deep brain stimulation for depression. (2022) · cites this paper as [62]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 32 · Cited by 79
- Authors
- van der Wal, J. M., Bergfeld, I. O., Lok, A., Mantione, M., Figee, M., Notten, P., Beute, G., Horst, F., van den Munckhof, P., Schuurman, P. R., & Denys, D.
- Affiliations
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
- University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
- Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis (NL)
- Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Bergfeld, Isidoor O.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2019-12-04
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 189-195
- ISSN
- 0022-3050 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-330X
- PMC
- PMC6996094
- OpenAlex
- W2992063002
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 6.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- KNAW Research Portal (The Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- KNAW research portal (Royal Academy of Art and Sciences (KNAW)) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- ZonMw (171201008)
- Medtronic
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Keywords
- deep brain stimulation, treatment-resistant depression, long-term efficacy, maintenance phase, adverse events, suicide attempts
- MeSH terms
- Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Treatment Outcome, Internal Capsule, Deep Brain Stimulation, Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review