Cited by 79Neurological disorders and treatmentsObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersTreatment of Major Depression

Long-term deep brain stimulation of the ventral anterior limb of the internal capsule for treatment-resistant depression

Open access
van der Wal, Junus M., Bergfeld, Isidoor O., Lok, Anja, Mantione, Mariska, Figee, Martijn, Notten, Peter, Beute, Guus, Horst, Ferdinand +3 more·2020·Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) reduces depressive symptoms in approximately 40%-60% of patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD), but data on long-term efficacy and safety are scarce. Our objective was to assess the efficacy and safety of DBS targeted at the ventral anterior limb of the internal capsule (vALIC) in 25 patients with TRD during a 1-year, open-label, maintenance period, which followed a 1-year optimisation period. METHODS: Depression severity was measured using the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D-17), Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and self-reported Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS-SR). Primary outcomes were response rate (≥50% HAM-D-17 score reduction) after the maintenance phase, approximately 2 years after DBS surgery, and changes in depression scores and occurrence of adverse events during the maintenance phase. RESULTS: Of 25 operated patients, 21 entered and 18 completed the maintenance phase. After the maintenance phase, eight patients were classified as responder (observed response rate: 44.4%; intention-to-treat: 32.0%). During the maintenance phase, HAM-D-17 and MADRS scores did not change, but the mean IDS-SR score decreased from 38.8 (95% CI 31.2 to 46.5) to 35.0 (95% CI 26.1 to 43.8) (p=0.008). Non-responders after optimisation did not improve during the maintenance phase. Four non-DBS-related serious adverse events occurred, including one suicide attempt. CONCLUSIONS: vALIC DBS for TRD showed continued efficacy 2 years after surgery, with symptoms remaining stable after optimisation as rated by clinicians and with patient ratings improving. This supports DBS as a viable treatment option for patients with TRD. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR2118.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jnnp-2019-321758

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the Van der Wal et al 2020 open-label study of 18 patients with treatment-resistant depression, ventral capsule/ventral striatum deep brain stimulation yielded a 27.8% remission rate at 24 months, measured by HDRS.

    “| | Van der Wal et al | 2020 Open label | N = 18 | 24 | 44.4% | 27.8% | HDRS |”

    From Deep brain stimulation for depression. (2022) · cites this paper as [62]

  • In the Van der Wal et al 2020 open-label study of 18 patients with treatment-resistant depression, ventral capsule/ventral striatum deep brain stimulation yielded a 44.4% response rate at 24 months, measured by HDRS.

    “| | Van der Wal et al | 2020 Open label | N = 18 | 24 | 44.4% | 27.8% | HDRS |”

    From Deep brain stimulation for depression. (2022) · cites this paper as [62]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32 · Cited by 79

Authors
van der Wal, J. M., Bergfeld, I. O., Lok, A., Mantione, M., Figee, M., Notten, P., Beute, G., Horst, F., van den Munckhof, P., Schuurman, P. R., & Denys, D.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis (NL)
  • Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience (NL)
Corresponding author
Bergfeld, Isidoor O.
Venue
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2019-12-04
Volume
91
Issue
2
Pages
189-195
ISSN
  • 0022-3050 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-330X
OpenAlex
W2992063002
Cited by
79
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3
FWCI
6.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • KNAW Research Portal (The Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • KNAW research portal (Royal Academy of Art and Sciences (KNAW)) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • ZonMw (171201008)
  • Medtronic
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
deep brain stimulation, treatment-resistant depression, long-term efficacy, maintenance phase, adverse events, suicide attempts
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Treatment Outcome, Internal Capsule, Deep Brain Stimulation, Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review