Cited by 43Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

In vivo PET imaging of neuroinflammation in familial frontotemporal dementia

Open access
Malpetti, Maura, Rittman, Timothy, Jones, Peter Simon, Cope, Thomas Edmund, Passamonti, Luca, Bevan-Jones, William Richard, Patterson, Karalyn, Fryer, Tim D +4 more·2021·Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Introduction: We report in vivo patterns of neuroinflammation and abnormal protein aggregation in seven cases of familial frontotemporal dementia (FTD) with mutations in MAPT, GRN and C9orf72 genes. Methods: Using positron emission tomography (PET), we explored the association of the distribution of activated microglia, as measured by the radioligand [ 11 C]PK11195, and the regional distribution of tau or TDP-43 pathology, indexed using the radioligand [ 18 F]AV-1451. The familial FTD PET data were compared with healthy controls. Results: Patients with familial FTD across all mutation groups showed increased [ 11 C]PK11195 binding predominantly in frontotemporal regions, with additional regions showing abnormalities in individuals. Patients with MAPT mutations had a consistent distribution of [ 18 F]AV-1451 binding across the brain, with heterogeneous distributions among carriers of GRN and C9orf72 mutations. Discussion: This case series suggests that neuroinflammation is part of the pathophysiology of familial FTD, warranting further consideration of immunomodulatory therapies for disease modification and prevention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jnnp-2020-323698

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 13 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    The two MAPT mutation carriers showed a consistent brain-wide distribution of [18F]AV-1451 binding.

    “Patients with MAPT mutations had a consistent distribution of [18F]AV-1451 binding across the brain, with heterogeneous distributions among carriers of GRN and C9orf72 mutations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The GRN and C9orf72 mutation carriers showed heterogeneous distributions of [18F]AV-1451 binding.

    “Patients with MAPT mutations had a consistent distribution of [18F]AV-1451 binding across the brain, with heterogeneous distributions among carriers of GRN and C9orf72 mutations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    In C9orf72 patients E and F, language impairments were accompanied by increased inflammation in the left inferior frontal gyrus and temporal regions.

    “Patients E and F also presented language impairments, and increased inflammation in left inferior frontal gyrus and temporal regions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    In the GRN case with non-fluent aphasia (Patient D), focal left inferior frontal inflammation was associated with the phenotype.

    “The GRN cases had different phenotypes for which the bvFTD in Patient C accompanied prominent orbitofrontal inflammation, but focal left inferior frontal inflammation in Patient D was associated with non-fluent aphasia.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    In the GRN case with bvFTD (Patient C), prominent orbitofrontal inflammation accompanied the phenotype.

    “The GRN cases had different phenotypes for which the bvFTD in Patient C accompanied prominent orbitofrontal inflammation, but focal left inferior frontal inflammation in Patient D was associated with non-fluent aphasia.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 4
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 2
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Among the MAPT carriers, elevated [11C]PK11195 binding occurred in fronto-striatal areas and was linked to behavioural variant FTD.

    “For example, in both MAPT patients, [11C]PK11195 binding was elevated in fronto-striatal regions in association with behavioural variant FTD[12], but Patient A’s language impairments accompany increased binding in temporal regions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [12] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In the seven patients with familial FTD due to MAPT, GRN, or C9orf72 mutations, [11C]PK11195 binding was increased mainly in frontotemporal regions, with some individuals showing additional affected regions.

    “Familial FTD patients across all mutation groups showed increased [11C]PK11195 binding predominantly in frontotemporal regions, with additional regions showing abnormalities in individuals.”
    • Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
      “Familial FTD was associated with neuroinflammation in frontotemporal regions, across all genes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    For voxel-wise and regional comparisons, the study used two control groups of healthy older adults matched to patients by age and sex.

    “For the voxel-wise and regional comparisons between patients and controls, we used two age- and sex-matched groups of healthy elderly adults (Supplementary Table 2), who underwent either [11C]PK11195 PET (N=15) or [18F]AV-1451 PET (N=15).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    In MAPT mutations, mutant tau misfolding might initiate neuroinflammation, which could then promote tau hyperphosphorylation and aggregation.

    “In patients with MAPT mutations, neuroinflammation may be triggered by the misfolding of mutant tau and contribute to its hyperphosphorylation and aggregation[4,14,16], while in C9orf72 and GRN cases, neuroinflammation could be triggered by dipeptide repeats or progranulin haploinsufficiency in advance of the large TDP-43 aggregates[14,17].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [4] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [14] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [16] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • Rests on an assumption: [11C]PK11195 binding is a valid marker of microglial activation and thus neuroinflammation.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Neuroinflammatory cascades in neurodegenerative diseases are complex and not limited to activated microglia.

    “However, neuroinflammatory cascade in neurodegenerative diseases is a complex process not confined to activated microglia[14,19].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [14] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [19] source

      Not checked in the free run.

5 of 5
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    [11C]PK11195 binding is a valid marker of microglial activation and thus neuroinflammation.

    “In addition, [11C]PK11195 enables the visualisation of increased TSPO expression, which is a marker for microglial activation.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    [18F]AV-1451 binding is sensitive to tau and TDP-43 pathology.

    “a radioligand sensitive to the presence of tau and TDP-43 pathology.”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PK-PET is increased in entorhinal, temporal, parietal, and cingulate cortex in AD, in frontotemporal regions in FTD, while PSP shows increased PK-PET binding in thalamus, putamen, and pallidum, showing differential distribution of neuroinflammatory processes in different types of dementia.

    “PK-PET is increased in the entorhinal, temporal, parietal and cingulate cortex in AD, in the frontotemporal regions in FTD, while PSP shows increased PK-PET binding in the thalamus, putamen and pallidum, showing differential distribution of neuroinflammatory processes in different types of dementia [215–218].”

    From The use of neuroimaging techniques in the early and differential diagnosis of dementia (2023) · cites this paper as [217]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In vivo PET and immunohistochemistry studies found increased microglial activation in the frontal and temporal cortices of patients with FTD.

    “In vivo PET studies320,321 and immunohistochemistry studies322–324 have found increased microglial activation in the frontal and temporal cortices of patients with FTD.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Malpetti, M., Rittman, T., Jones, P. S., Cope, T. E., Passamonti, L., Bevan-Jones, W. R., Patterson, K., Fryer, T. D., Hong, Y. T., Aigbirhio, F. I., O'Brien, J. T., & Rowe, J. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (GB)
Corresponding author
Rowe, James Benedict
Venue
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2020-10-29
Volume
92
Issue
3
Pages
319-322
ISSN
  • 0022-3050 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-330X
OpenAlex
W3095515993
Cited by
43
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo
Funders
  • Cambridge Centre for Parkinson-Plus (RG95450)
  • NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (146281)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/P01271X/1)
  • Wellcome Trust (103838)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
familial frontotemporal dementia, neuroinflammation, activated microglia, [11C]PK11195, tau pathology, TDP-43 pathology, 18F-AV-1451, MAPT mutations, GRN mutations, C9orf72 mutation, protein aggregation, immunomodulatory therapy
MeSH terms
C9orf72 Protein, Progranulins, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, tau Proteins, Positron-Emission Tomography, Frontotemporal Dementia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review