The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Autoimmune limbic encephalitis in 39 patients: immunophenotypes and outcomes
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: About 40% of patients with limbic encephalitis do not have detectable CNS antibodies. Some of these patients have immune-mediated limbic encephalitis, but their frequency is unknown. AIMS: (1) To determine the spectrum of limbic encephalitis identified on clinical grounds in a single institution, and compare it with that in patients referred for antibody analysis. (2) To correlate clinical outcomes with the cellular location of the autoantigens. METHODS: Prospective clinical case studies. Immunohistochemistry with rat brain, live hippocampal neurones, HeLa cells expressing Kv potassium channels and immunoblot. RESULTS: In 4 years, 17 patients were identified in the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA, and the serum or CSF samples of 22 patients diagnosed elsewhere were also studied. 9 of our 17 (53%) patients had antibodies to known neuronal antigens (paraneoplastic or voltage gated potassium channels (VGKCs)) and 5 (29%) to novel cell-membrane antigens (nCMAg) typically expressed in the hippocampus and sometimes in the cerebellum. Considering the entire series, 19 of 39 (49%) patients had antibodies to known antigens, and 17 (44%) to nCMAg. Follow-up (2-48 months, median 19 months) was available for 35 patients. When compared with patients with antibodies to intraneuronal antigens, a significant association with response to treatment was found in those with antibodies to cell-membrane antigens in general (VGKC or nCMAg, p = 0.003) or to nCMAg (p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: (1) 82% of patients with limbic encephalitis prospectively identified on clinical grounds had CNS antibodies; (2) responsiveness to treatment is not limited to patients with VGKC antibodies; (3) in many patients (29% from a single institution), the autoantigens were unknown but were found to be highly enriched in neuronal cell membranes of the hippocampus; and (4) these antibodies are associated with a favourable outcome.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Paraneoplastic syndromes of the CNS
Dalmau, J., & Rosenfeld, M. R. (2008) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(08)70060-7 · Cited by 873
Self-citationNeuroinflammation and psychiatric illness
Najjar, S., Pearlman, D. M., Alper, K., Najjar, A., & Devinsky, O. (2013) · Journal of Neuroinflammation · doi:10.1186/1742-2094-10-43 · Cited by 733
Anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis: diagnosis, psychiatric presentation, and treatment
Chapman, M. R., & Vause, H. E. (2011) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.10020181 · Cited by 167
Geschwind, M. D., Haman, A., & Miller, B. L. (2007) · Neurologic Clinics · doi:10.1016/j.ncl.2007.04.001 · Cited by 143
Metadata
- Authors
- Bataller, L., Kleopa, K. A., Wu, G. F., Rossi, J. E., Rosenfeld, M. R., & Dalmau, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2006-10-03
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 381-385
- ISSN
- 0022-3050 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2133598902
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Autoimmune limbic encephalitis in 39 patients: immunophenotypes and outcomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/jnnp.2006.100644
- The paper
- Bataller, L., Kleopa, K. A., Wu, G. F., Rossi, J. E., Rosenfeld, M. R., & Dalmau, J. (2006). Autoimmune limbic encephalitis in 39 patients: immunophenotypes and outcomes. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2006.100644
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.