Analysis of survival and prognostic factors in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a population based study
Abstract
Objective To measure survivorship and predictors of prognosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Methods Incident cases, diagnosed in the 1998-1999 period and classified according to the El Escorial criteria, were enrolled from a prospective population based registry established in Puglia, Southern Italy, with a reference population of 4,025,329. Cases were followed up until death or 30 June 2004. Results We identified 130 incident cases of ALS while four were lost to follow-up. Median survival was 28 months from first symptoms and 16 months from diagnosis, while cumulative survivorship at 4 years was approximately 30%. Advanced age (>75 years: hazard ratio (HR) 7.5; 95% CI 1.9 to 29.6; p = 0.004) and bulbar or generalised (HR 1.8; 95% CI 1.1 to 3.0; p = 0.01) onset of symptoms were independent predictors of adverse survival. After stratifying patients according to site of first symptoms, age was a predictor of death among spinal (HR for patients aged >75 years compared with patients aged 45 years or less: HR 11; 95% CI 1.5 to 78.5; p = 0.01) but not among bulbar ALS (HR 4.5; 95% CI 0.4 to 46.5; p = 0.2). Among spinal onset cases, cases with predominant upper motoneuronal (UMN) involvement presented with a borderline significant better survivorship (HR 0.5; 95% CI 0.2 to 1.3; p = 0.1) Conclusions Bulbar signs and advanced age among subjects with spinal onset were indicators of poor prognosis while El Escorial category at entry did not predict survival. Among subjects wit…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The median survival time is well within the range reported by several population-based studies, which extends from 16 months to 28 months, with most studies reporting values between 19 and 23 months.
“it is well within the range reported by several population-based studies, which extends from 16 months (65;66) to 28 months (67), with most studies reporting values between 19 and 23 months (68–70).”
From Association of ALS with head injury, cigarette smoking and APOE genotypes (2010) · cites this paper as [66]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Effects of gender in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
McCombe, P. A., & Henderson, R. D. (2010) · Gender Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.genm.2010.11.010 · Cited by 379 · see citing works
Fang, T., Al Khleifat, A., Meurgey, J.-H., Jones, A., Leigh, P. N., Bensimon, G., & Al-Chalabi, A. (2018) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(18)30054-1 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
Association of ALS with head injury, cigarette smoking and APOE genotypes
Schmidt, S., Kwee, L. C., Allen, K. D., & Oddone, E. Z. (2010) · Journal of the Neurological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jns.2010.01.011 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Binazzi, A., Belli, S., Uccelli, R., Desiato, M. T., Talamanca, I. F., Antonini, G., Corsi, F., Scoppetta, C., Inghilleri, M., Pontieri, F., et al. (2008) · Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis · doi:10.1080/17482960802382313 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Gamez, J., & Carmona, F. (2021) · Journal of the Neurological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jns.2021.117586 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zoccolella, S., Beghi, E., Palagano, G., Fraddosio, A., Guerra, V, Samarelli, V, Lepore, V, Simone, I. L., Lamberti, P., Serlenga, L., Logroscino, G., & for the SLAP Registry
- Venue
- Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2008-01-01
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 33-37
- ISSN
- 0022-3050
- Cited by
- 121
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review