Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 384

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Impact of collateral flow on tissue fate in acute ischaemic stroke

Open access
Bang, O Y, Saver, J L, Buck, B H, Alger, J R, Starkman, S, Ovbiagele, B, Kim, D, Jahan, R, Duckwiler, G R, Yoon, S R, Vinuela, F, Liebeskind, D S, for the UCLA Collateral Investigators·2007·Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Collaterals may sustain penumbra prior to recanalisation yet the influence of baseline collateral flow on infarct growth following endovascular therapy remains unknown. METHODS: Consecutive patients underwent serial diffusion and perfusion MRI before and after endovascular therapy for acute cerebral ischaemia. We assessed the relationship between MRI diffusion and perfusion lesion indices, angiographic collateral grade and infarct growth. Tmax perfusion lesion maps were generated and diffusion-perfusion mismatch regions were divided into Tmax >or=4 s (severe delay) and Tmax >or=2 but <4 s (mild delay). RESULTS: Among 44 patients, collateral grade was poor in 7 (15.9%), intermediate in 20 (45.5%) and good in 17 (38.6%) patients. Although diffusion-perfusion mismatch volume was not different depending on the collateral grade, patients with good collaterals had larger areas of milder perfusion delay than those with poor collaterals (p = 0.005). Among 32 patients who underwent day 3-5 post-treatment MRIs, the degree of pretreatment collateral circulation (r = -0.476, p = 0.006) and volume of diffusion-perfusion mismatch (r = 0.371, p = 0.037) were correlated with infarct growth. Greatest infarct growth occurred in patients with both non-recanalisation and poor collaterals. Multiple regression analysis revealed that pretreatment collateral grade was independently associated with infarct growth. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that angiographic collateral grade and penumbral volume interactively shape tissue fate in patients undergoing endovascular recanalisation therapy. These angiographic and MRI parameters provide complementary information about residual blood flow that may help guide treatment decision making in acute cerebral ischaemia.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jnnp.2007.132100

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 384

Metadata

Authors
Bang, O. Y., Saver, J. L., Buck, B. H., Alger, J. R., Starkman, S., Ovbiagele, B., Kim, D., Jahan, R., Duckwiler, G. R., Yoon, S. R., Vinuela, F., Liebeskind, D. S., & for the UCLA Collateral Investigators
Venue
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2007-10-10
Volume
79
Issue
6
Pages
625-629
ISSN
0022-3050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2148016499
Cited by
384
References
0
FWCI
8.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of collateral flow on tissue fate in acute ischaemic stroke. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/jnnp.2007.132100
The paper
Bang, O. Y., Saver, J. L., Buck, B. H., Alger, J. R., Starkman, S., Ovbiagele, B., Kim, D., Jahan, R., Duckwiler, G. R., Yoon, S. R., Vinuela, F., Liebeskind, D. S., & for the UCLA Collateral Investigators. (2007). Impact of collateral flow on tissue fate in acute ischaemic stroke. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2007.132100

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.