Cited by 90Treatment of Major DepressionMental Health Treatment and AccessAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Antidepressants for the treatment of depression in neurological disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Price, A., Rayner, L., Okon-Rocha, E., Evans, A., Valsraj, K., Higginson, I. J., Hotopf, M.·2011·Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the high prevalence of depression in people with neurological disorders, no previous study has sought to summarise existing evidence on the use of antidepressants in this population. A systematic review and meta-analysis was undertaken to determine whether antidepressants are more effective than placebo in the treatment of depression in neurological disorders, and whether any benefit is associated with improvement in function. METHODS: Embase, Pubmed, Psycinfo and Cochrane trial registers were searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy of antidepressant and placebo in the treatment of depression in adults with a neurological disorder. FINDINGS: 20 RCTs were included in the review, including patients with Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, brain injury, epilepsy and stroke. Outcomes were analysed at four time points: 4-5 weeks, 6-8 weeks, 9-18 weeks and >18 weeks. The primary outcome was response to treatment at 6-8 weeks. The evidence favoured the use of antidepressants over placebo at all time points although pooled results were not statistically significant at all time points. At 6-8 weeks, antidepressant treatment was associated with a greater than twofold odds of remission (OR 2.23; 95% CI 1.54 to 3.23; number needed to treat=7). Fewer data were available for quality of life, and functional and cognitive outcomes, and there was little evidence of improvement with antidepressant treatment. INTERPRETATION: Antidepressants are effective for the treatment of depression in patients with neurological disorders but the evidence for the efficacy of antidepressants in improving quality of life, and functional and cognitive outcomes is inconclusive.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jnnp.2010.230862

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The effect size for depression was similar to that identified in a meta-analysis of antidepressants for neurological disorders.

    “Our effect size for depression was similar to that identified in a meta-analysis of antidepressants for NDs (Price et al., 2011), which mirrors the short-term clinical equivalence of psychological and pharmacological treatments observed in the general population (Cuijpers et al., 2023).”
  • Evidence for the effectiveness of pharmacological interventions in treating PD neuropsychiatric symptoms is mixed.

    “Evidence for the effectiveness of pharmacological interventions in treating PD neuropsychiatric symptoms is mixed (Price et al., 2011”

    From Remote delivery of psychological interventions for Parkinson's disease. (2018) · cites this paper as Price et al., 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Price, A., Rayner, L., Okon-Rocha, E., Evans, A., Valsraj, K., Higginson, I. J., & Hotopf, M.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Price, A.
Venue
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2011-05-10
Volume
82
Issue
8
Pages
914-923
ISSN
0022-3050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2152273683
Cited by
90
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
antidepressants, depression, neurological disorders, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, brain injury, epilepsy, stroke, remission, quality of life, functional outcome, cognitive outcomes
MeSH terms
Adult, Antidepressive Agents, Cognition, Depression, Humans, Nervous System Diseases, Quality of Life, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review