Cited by 38Neurological disorders and treatmentsMotor Control and AdaptationBotulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders

Application of an objective method of assessing intention tremor - a further study on the use of weights to reduce intention tremor.

Open access
Morgan, M H, Hewer, R L, Cooper, R·1975·Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry

Abstract

Thirty-one patients with intention tremor due to a variety of causes were subjected to measurements of their intention tremor. The effect of varying amounts of lead weights on the amount of limb tremor recorded was noted. It is concluded that simple methods of treatment may be of benefit, and that an objective method of measuring intention tremor overcomes many of the difficulties of a clinical trial of this type. The method described yields quantifiable data which can be subjected to statistical analysis to help overcome the problem of variability. Bias in the results due to practice or fatigue effects has proved negligible. An optimum amount of lead, which was usually between 600 and 840 g, has been noted.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jnnp.38.3.259

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Limb weighting is often recommended as a non-invasive tremor management approach, yet it lacks strong supporting evidence.

    “Weighting the limb is a commonly recommended non-invasive way to manage limb tremor7, but has little evidence to support it8, 9.”

    From A noninvasive handheld assistive device to accommodate essential tremor: A pilot study (2014) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Results report a significant reduction in intention tremor in 20 of 31 patients, supporting limb weighting as a potential management approach. But the paper does not say weighting is commonly recommended or assess whether the overall evidence base is weak; its Discussion describes its own findings as confirming a significant reduction. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morgan, M. H., Hewer, R. L., & Cooper, R.
Affiliations
Frenchay Hospital (GB)
Venue
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1975-03-01
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
259-264
ISSN
0022-3050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2135154607
Cited by
38
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
Keywords
intention tremor, lead weights, tremor suppression, tremor assessment, tremor treatment, practice effects
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Child, Fatigue, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Movement, Tremor, Physical Therapy Modalities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review