The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Residual complaints of patients two years after severe head injury.
Open accessAbstract
In a follow up study of 57 patients who had sustained a severe closed head injury, 84% still reported some residual deficit in their psychological functioning after two years, with forgetfulness being the most common complaint. Expressing the severity of the injury in terms of both the duration of post-traumatic amnesia (PTA) and the extent to which previous work could be resumed (RTW), principal components analyses showed that the occurrence of "impairment complaints"--viz forgetfulness, slowness, poor concentration and inability to divide attention over two simultaneous activities--was positively related to severity. The other complaints, which in the main could be labelled as "intolerances" were not. The same pattern was found when the analyses were based on deficits of the patients as they were reported by relatives. Severity was not appreciably related to the total number of complaints. The correlation between PTA and RTW was 0.52, indicating that with longer PTA duration, work is likely to be resumed at a lower level, or not at all. Though Russell's cut-off of one week PTA to differentiate between severe and very severe concussion appeared useful, in the present study a further cut-off point at the unlucky number of 13 days was considered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Manly, T., Anderson, V., Nimmo‐Smith, I., Turner, A., Watson, P., & Robertson, I. H. (2001) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00806 · Cited by 693
Psychosocial and Emotional Outcomes 10 Years Following Traumatic Brain Injury
Draper, K., Ponsford, J., & Schönberger, M. (2007) · Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/01.htr.0000290972.63753.a7 · Cited by 279
Cognitive and psychosocial outcome following moderate or severe traumatic brain injury
HELLAWELL, R. T. (1999) · Brain Injury · doi:10.1080/026990599121403 · Cited by 166
Self-Alert Training: Volitional modulation of autonomic arousal improves sustained attention
O’Connell, R. G., Bellgrove, M. A., Dockree, P. M., Lau, A., Fitzgerald, M., & Robertson, I. H. (2008) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.12.018 · Cited by 124
The psychosocial impact of neurobehavioral disability
Williams, C., Wood, R. L., Alderman, N., & Worthington, A. (2020) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2020.00119 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- van Zomeren, A. H., & van den Burg, W.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1985-01-01
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 21-28
- ISSN
- 0022-3050 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2088131067
- Cited by
- 512
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Residual complaints of patients two years after severe head injury. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/jnnp.48.1.21
- The paper
- van Zomeren, A. H., & van den Burg, W. (1985). Residual complaints of patients two years after severe head injury. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.48.1.21
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.