Cited by 279Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesMedical Practices and Rehabilitation

Psychosocial and Emotional Outcomes 10 Years Following Traumatic Brain Injury

Draper, Kristy, Ponsford, Jennie, Schönberger, Michael·2007·Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation

Abstract

Objectives To investigate the association of psychosocial outcome 10 years following traumatic brain injury (TBI) with demographic variables, injury severity, current cognitive functioning, emotional state, aggression, alcohol use, and fatigue. Setting Community-based follow-up. Participants Fifty-three participants with mild to very severe TBI sustained 10 years previously and significant others. Measures Sydney Psychosocial Reintegration Scale, Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, NFI Aggression scale, Fatigue Severity Scale, Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test, neuropsychological tests of attention/processing speed, memory, and executive function. Results Psychosocial functioning was lowest in the occupational activity domain and highest in the living skills domains. Variables including education, posttraumatic amnesia duration, numerous cognitive measures, concurrent fatigue, aggression, anxiety, and depression were all significantly associated with psychosocial outcome, although the strength of correlations varied between ratings of participants with TBI and relatives. Posttraumatic amnesia duration was most strongly associated with psychosocial outcome measured by relatives; anxiety, aggression, and depression were the strongest predictors when ratings were assigned by participants with TBI. Self-reported fatigue, depression, and alcohol use were the strongest predictors of aggression. Conclusions It is important to address proble…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.htr.0000290972.63753.a7

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Draper, K., Ponsford, J., & Schönberger, M.
Affiliations
Epworth Hospital (AU)
Venue
Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
Published
2007-09
Volume
22
Issue
5
Pages
278-287
ISSN
0885-9701 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1969874465
Cited by
279
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 17
FWCI
9.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
Keywords
traumatic brain injury, psychosocial outcomes, long-term follow-up, post-traumatic amnesia, anxiety, depression, aggression, fatigue, alcohol consumption, cognitive function, occupational activity, life skills, family caregivers, Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aggression, Alcohol Drinking, Amnesia, Anxiety, Brain Injuries, Cognition Disorders, Depression, Fatigue, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Injury Severity Score

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review