The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A randomised controlled study comparing bromocriptine to which levodopa was later added, with levodopa alone in previously untreated patients with Parkinson's disease: a five year follow up.
Open accessAbstract
This pilot study was performed to compare the occurrence of long term motor complications in Parkinson's disease when the introduction of levodopa was delayed by an initial treatment with high doses of bromocriptine alone. The trial was a prospective randomised controlled study comparing 31 previously untreated patients with Parkinson's disease initially given bromocriptine alone to which levodopa was later added (group B/D) and 29 other previously untreated patients with Parkinson's disease immediately given levodopa alone (group D). The end point was the occurrence of the first motor complications (wearing off or dyskinesia). Group B/D patients received bromocriptine (52 (SEM 5) mg/day) for 2.7 years, to which levodopa was later added (471 (SEM 46) mg/day). Group D patients received a comparable dose of levodopa alone (569 (SEM 47) mg/day). Both had similar disability scores at the end of the study. Motor complications were fewer and appeared later in group B/D than in group D (56% after 4.9 (SEM 0.5) years of treatment v 90% after 2.7 (SEM 0.5) years, p < 0.01). Wearing off appeared later (p < 0.01) in group B/D (4.5 (SEM 0.6) years) than in group D (2.9 (SEM 0.6) years). Peak dose dyskinesia occurred less often in group B/D patients (three v 14 cases, p < 0.01). This study showed that a three year initial monotherapy with high doses of bromocriptine followed by addition of levodopa delayed the occurrence of long term motor complications usually found in patients with Parkinson's disease treated with levodopa alone from the beginning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Parkinsonism: onset, progression, and mortality
Hoehn, M. M., & Yahr, M. D. (1967) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.17.5.427 · Cited by 12,107
The relevance of the Lewy body to the pathogenesis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease.
Gibb, W. R., & Lees, A. J. (1988) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.51.6.745 · Cited by 3,481
Cited by
Rascol, O., Brooks, D. J., Korczyn, A. D., De Deyn, P. P., Clarke, C. E., & Lang, A. E. (2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200005183422004 · Cited by 1,539
Self-citationAhlskog, J. E., & Muenter, M. D. (2001) · Movement Disorders · doi:10.1002/mds.1090 · Cited by 1,454
Subthalamic nucleus or internal pallidal stimulation in young onset Parkinson's disease
Krack, P. (1998) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/121.3.451 · Cited by 608
Levodopa in the treatment of Parkinson's disease
Schapira, A. H. V., Emre, M., Jenner, P., & Poewe, W. (2009) · European Journal of Neurology · doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02697.x · Cited by 231
van Laar, T. (2003) · CNS Drugs · doi:10.2165/00023210-200317070-00002 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Montastruc, J. L., Rascol, O., Senard, J. M., & Rascol, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1994-09-01
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1034-1038
- ISSN
- 0022-3050 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2161688791
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A randomised controlled study comparing bromocriptine to which levodopa was later added, with levodopa alone in previously untreated patients with Parkinson's disease: a five year follow up. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/jnnp.57.9.1034
- The paper
- Montastruc, J. L., Rascol, O., Senard, J. M., & Rascol, A. (1994). A randomised controlled study comparing bromocriptine to which levodopa was later added, with levodopa alone in previously untreated patients with Parkinson's disease: a five year follow up. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.57.9.1034
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.