The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The first unprovoked, untreated seizure in childhood: a hospital based study of the accuracy of the diagnosis, rate of recurrence, and long term outcome after recurrence. Dutch study of epilepsy in childhood
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the accuracy of the diagnosis of a first unprovoked seizure in childhood, the recurrence rate within two years, the risk factors for recurrence, and the long term outcome two years after recurrence. METHODS One hundred and fifty six children aged 1 month to 16 years after a first seizure, and 51 children with a single disputable event were followed up. The diagnosis of a seizure was confirmed by a panel of three child neurologists on the basis of predescribed diagnostic criteria. None of the children was treated after the first episode. RESULTS Five children with a disputable event developed epileptic seizures during follow up. The diagnosis did not have to be revised in any of the 156 children with a first seizure. The overall recurrence rate after two years was 54%. Significant risk factors were an epileptiform EEG (recurrence rate 71%) and remote symptomatic aetiology and/or mental retardation (recurrence rate 74%). For the 85 children with one or more recurrences, terminal remission irrespective of treatment two years after the first recurrence was >12 months in 50 (59%), CONCLUSIONS The diagnosis of a first seizure can be made accurately with the help of strict diagnostic criteria. The use of these criteria may have contributed to the rather high risk of recurrence in this series. However, the overall prognosis for a child presenting with a single seizure is excellent, even if treatment with antiepileptic drugs is not immediately instituted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
ILAE official report: a practical clinical definition of epilepsy
Fisher, R. S., Acevedo, C., Arzimanoglou, A., Bogacz, A., Cross, J. H., Elger, C. E., Engel, J., Forsgren, L., French, J. A., Glynn, M., et al. (2014) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1111/epi.12550 · Cited by 6,108
Kim, L. G., Johnson, T. L., Marson, A. G., & Chadwick, D. W. (2006) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(06)70383-0 · Cited by 320
Hirtz, D., Berg, A., Bettis, D., Camfield, C., Camfield, P., Crumrine, P., Gaillard, W. D., Schneider, S., & Shinnar, S. (2003) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000033622.27961.b6 · Cited by 213
Metadata
- Authors
- Stroink, H., Brouwer, O. F., Arts, W. F., Geerts, A. T., Peters, A. C. B., & van Donselaar, C. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1998-05-01
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 595-600
- ISSN
- 0022-3050 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2155614216
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The first unprovoked, untreated seizure in childhood: a hospital based study of the accuracy of the diagnosis, rate of recurrence, and long term outcome after recurrence. Dutch study of epilepsy in childhood. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/jnnp.64.5.595
- The paper
- Stroink, H., Brouwer, O. F., Arts, W. F., Geerts, A. T., Peters, A. C. B., & van Donselaar, C. A. (1998). The first unprovoked, untreated seizure in childhood: a hospital based study of the accuracy of the diagnosis, rate of recurrence, and long term outcome after recurrence. Dutch study of epilepsy in childhood. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.64.5.595
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.