The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prediction of risk of seizure recurrence after a single seizure and early epilepsy: further results from the MESS trial
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The MRC Multicentre trial for Early Epilepsy and Single Seizures (MESS) showed a reduced risk of further seizures in patients, for whom treatment with antiepileptic drugs was uncertain, who were randomly assigned immediate treatment compared with delayed treatment. However, there was no evidence of an effect on [corrected] long-term remission rates. This study was undertaken to assess the role of patient characteristics and treatment in the prediction of seizure recurrence. This will enable decision-making on the basis of the perceived risk of treatment compared with the benefit of reducing the risk of further seizures in the initial years after diagnosis. METHODS: A prognostic model was developed based on individual patient data from MESS to enable identification of patients at low, medium, or high risk of seizure recurrence. A split-sample approach was used in which the model was developed on a subsample of the full data and validated on the remainder of the sample. Distinction of the prognostic groups and predictive accuracy of the model were assessed. FINDINGS: Number of seizures of all types at presentation, presence of a neurological disorder, and an abnormal electroencephalogram (EEG) were significant factors in indicating future seizures. Individuals with two or three seizures, a neurological disorder, or an abnormal EEG were identified as the medium-risk group, those with two of these features or more than three seizures as the high-risk group, and those with a single seizure only as the low-risk group. INTERPRETATION: The model shows that there is little benefit to immediate treatment in patients at low risk of seizure recurrence, but potentially worthwhile benefits are seen in those at medium and high risk.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Assessment and comparison of prognostic classification schemes for survival data
Graf, E., Schmoor, C., Sauerbrei, W., & Schumacher, M. (1999) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19990915/30)18:17/18<2529::aid-sim274>3.0.co;2-5 · Cited by 975
Remission of Seizures and Relapse in Patients with Epilepsy
Annegers, J. F., Hauser, W. A., & Elveback, L. R. (1979) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1111/j.1528-1157.1979.tb04857.x · Cited by 622
Regression, Prediction and Shrinkage
Copas, J. B. (1983) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1983.tb01258.x · Cited by 612
The risk of seizure recurrence following a first unprovoked seizure: A quantitative review
Berg, A. T., & Shinnar, S. (1991) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.41.7.965 · Cited by 511
A new measure of prognostic separation in survival data
Royston, P., & Sauerbrei, W. (2004) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1621 · Cited by 450
Marson, A., Jacoby, A., Johnson, A., Kim, L., Gamble, C., & Chadwick, D. (2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66694-9 · Cited by 438
Self-citationSeizure, F., & Trial Group (FIR.S.T. GROUP) (1993) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.43.3_part_1.478 · Cited by 264
Treatment of first tonic-clonic seizure does not improve the prognosis of epilepsy
Musicco, M., Beghi, E., Solari, A., Viani, F., & First Seizure Trial Group (FIRST Group) (1997) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.49.4.991 · Cited by 261
Stroink, H., Brouwer, O. F., Arts, W. F., Geerts, A. T., Peters, A. C. B., & van Donselaar, C. A. (1998) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.64.5.595 · Cited by 164
Camfield, P. R., Camfield, C. S., Dooley, J. M., Smith, E., & Garner, B. (1989) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.39.6.851 · Cited by 74
Cited by
ILAE official report: a practical clinical definition of epilepsy
Fisher, R. S., Acevedo, C., Arzimanoglou, A., Bogacz, A., Cross, J. H., Elger, C. E., Engel, J., Forsgren, L., French, J. A., Glynn, M., et al. (2014) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1111/epi.12550 · Cited by 6,108
Krumholz, A., Wiebe, S., Gronseth, G. S., Gloss, D. S., Sanchez, A. M., Kabir, A. A., Liferidge, A. T., Martello, J. P., Kanner, A. M., Shinnar, S., et al. (2015) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000001487 · Cited by 343
Drug treatment of epilepsy in adults
Schmidt, D., & Schachter, S. C. (2014) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.g254 · Cited by 323
Bonnett, L., Smith, C. T., Smith, D., Williamson, P., Chadwick, D., & Marson, A. G. (2012) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(12)70018-2 · Cited by 69
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, L. G., Johnson, T. L., Marson, A. G., & Chadwick, D. W.
- Venue
- The Lancet Neurology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-04
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 317-322
- ISSN
- 1474-4422 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2063600541
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 6.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prediction of risk of seizure recurrence after a single seizure and early epilepsy: further results from the MESS trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1474-4422(06)70383-0
- The paper
- Kim, L. G., Johnson, T. L., Marson, A. G., & Chadwick, D. W. (2006). Prediction of risk of seizure recurrence after a single seizure and early epilepsy: further results from the MESS trial. The Lancet Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(06)70383-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.