The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Executive dysfunction in subcortical ischaemic vascular disease
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Executive dysfunction has been reported in patients with subcortical-frontal pathology, even in the absence of dementia. OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to determine if impairments in executive functioning could be found in non-demented patients with subcortical lacunes. METHODS: Cross sectional comparison between older control subjects (n=27) and non-demented patients with one or more subcortical lacunes (n=12). All participants were administered a neuropsychological test battery incorporating three measures of executive functioning, the Stroop interference test, California card sorting test, and the initiation-perseveration subtest of the Mattis dementia rating scale. RESULTS: No group differences were found on measures of recent verbal memory, language, or spatial ability. Normal controls performed better than patients with lacunes in visual memory. On the Stroop interference test, patients with lacunes performed as well as controls on the colour naming condition but slower on the interference condition. Patients with lacunes also generated fewer correct sorts on the California card sort test and achieved lower scores on the initiation-perseveration subtest. Executive measures were correlated with extent of white matter signal hyperintensity but not number of lacunes. CONCLUSION: Subcortical ischaemic vascular disease is associated with subtle declines in executive functioning and visual memory, even in non-demented patients. The pattern of cognitive impairment after subcortical lacunes is consistent with models of subcortical-frontal circuits.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The cognitive correlates of white matter abnormalities in normal aging: A quantitative review.
Gunning-Dixon, F. M., & Raz, N. (2000) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/0894-4105.14.2.224 · Cited by 794
Cited by
White matter hyperintensities, cognitive impairment and dementia: an update
Prins, N. D., & Scheltens, P. (2015) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2015.10 · Cited by 1,284
Subcortical ischaemic vascular dementia
Román, G. C., Erkinjuntti, T., Wallin, A., Pantoni, L., & Chui, H. C. (2002) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(02)00190-4 · Cited by 1,067
Reliability and validity of the delis-kaplan executive function system: An update.
DELIS, D. C., KRAMER, J. H., KAPLAN, E., & HOLDNACK, J. (2004) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617704102191 · Cited by 567
Self-citationEFNS guidelines for the diagnosis and management of Alzheimer's disease
Hort, J., O’Brien, J. T., Gainotti, G., Pirttila, T., Popescu, B. O., Rektorova, I., Sorbi, S., Scheltens, P., & Dementia, O. B. O. T. E. S. P. O. (2010) · European Journal of Neurology · doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.03040.x · Cited by 490
Cognitive dysfunction in patients with cerebral microbleeds on T2*-weighted gradient-echo MRI
Werring, D. J. (2004) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awh253 · Cited by 421
Metadata
- Authors
- Kramer, J. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2002-02-01
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 217-220
- ISSN
- 0022-3050 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2087760712
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Executive dysfunction in subcortical ischaemic vascular disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/jnnp.72.2.217
- The paper
- Kramer, J. H. (2002). Executive dysfunction in subcortical ischaemic vascular disease. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.72.2.217
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.