Cited by 100Philosophical Ethics and TheoryPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionAutism Spectrum Disorder Research

‘Autism and the good life’: a new approach to the study of well-being

Open access
Rodogno, Raffaele, Krause-Jensen, Katrine, Ashcroft, Richard E·2016·Journal of Medical Ethics

Abstract

Medical, psychological, educational and social interventions to modify the behaviour of autistic people are only justified if they confer benefit on those people. However, it is not clear how 'benefit' should be understood. Most such interventions are justified by referring to the prospect that they will effect lasting improvements in the well-being and happiness of autistic people, so they can lead good lives. What does a good life for an autistic person consist in? Can we assume that his or her well-being is substantively the same as the well-being of non-autistic individuals? In this paper, we argue that, as it stands, the current approach to the study of well-being is for the most part unable to answer these questions. In particular, much effort is needed in order to improve the epistemology of well-being, especially so if we wish this epistemology to be 'autism-sensitive'. Towards the end of the paper, we sketch a new, autism-sensitive approach and apply it in order to begin answering our initial questions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/medethics-2016-103595

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dominant conceptions of the good life, including flourishing, typically rely on species-typical intuitions regarding what is good or desirable, and so encounter a methodological issue when tasked with accounting for neurodivergent modes of flourishing grounded in atypical intuitions.

    “Their point is that dominant conceptions of the good life, including of flourishing, typically rely on species-typical intuitions regarding what is good or desirable, and so encounter a methodological issue when tasked with accounting for neurodivergent modes of flourishing that may be grounded in atypical intuitions.”

    From Neurodiversity, epistemic injustice, and the good human life (2022) · cites this paper as Rodogno et al., 2016

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Aristotle, 1984. Nicomachean Ethics. Trans. W.D. Ross. In: Barnes J. (ed.). The Complete Works of Aristotle, 2 vols. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  2. Calder, L., Hill, V., & Pellicano, E. 2013. '"Sometimes I want to play by myself": Understanding what friendship means to children with autism in mainstream primary schools', Autism 17(3):296-316
  3. Darwall, S. 2002. Welfare and Rational Care. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
  4. Fltecher, G. 2015. Objective List Theories. In: Fletcher, G. (ed.) The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Well-Being. Routledge: London and New York.
  5. Han, S., Northoff, G., Vogeley, K., Wexler, B.E., Kitayama, S., Varnum, M.E.W. 2013. A Cultural Neuroscience Approach to the Biosocial Nature of the Human Brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 64:335-59
  6. Haybron, D. 2008. The pursuit of unhappiness: The elusive psychology of well-being. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  7. Mill, J.S. (1859). On Liberty. In: J.M. Robson (ed.) (1963-1991), Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vol. XVIII. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Retrieved 27/1/2016 from the World Wide Web: http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/165
  8. Mill, J.S. (1861). Utilitarianism. In: J.M. Robson (ed.) (1963-1991), Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vol. X. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Retrieved 27/1/2016 from the World Wide Web: http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/165
  9. Rodogno, R. 2015. Prudential Value or Well-Being. In: Sander, D. & Brosch, T. (eds.) Oxford Handbook of Value: The Affective Sciences of Values and Valuation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  10. Rodogno, R. 2014a. Happiness and Well-Being: Shifting the Focus of the Current Debate. South African Journal of Philosophy 33(4), 451-479
  11. Rodogno, R. 2014b. Well-Being between Science and Philosophy. In Søraker, J.H., Jan-Willem, van der R., de Boer, J., Wong, P.-H., Brey, P. (Eds.) Well-Being in Contemporary Society. Springer: 39-58
  12. Russell, D. 2012. Human Happiness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  13. Sumner, W.L. 1996. Welfare, happiness, and ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rodogno, R., Krause-Jensen, K., & Ashcroft, R. E.
Affiliations
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Rodogno, Raffaele
Venue
Journal of Medical Ethics
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2016-05-12
Volume
42
Issue
6
Pages
401-408
ISSN
  • 0306-6800 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-4257
OpenAlex
W2385611587
Cited by
100
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
18.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Ethics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, well-being, good life, justification of intervention, happiness
MeSH terms
Autistic Disorder, Behavior Therapy, Humans, Quality of Life, Research, Knowledge, Beneficence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review