The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mortality among a cohort of garment workers exposed to formaldehyde: an update
Open accessAbstract
Aims:To evaluate the mortality experience of 11 039 workers exposed to formaldehyde for three months or more in three garment plants. The mean time weighted average formaldehyde exposure at the plants in the early 1980s was 0.15 ppm but past exposures may have been substantially higher. Methods:Vital status was updated through 1998, and life table analyses were conducted. Results:Mortality from all causes (2206 deaths, standardised mortality ratio (SMR) 0.92, 95% CI 0.88 to 0.96) and all cancers (SMR 0.89, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.97) was less than expected based on US mortality rates. A non-significant increase in mortality from myeloid leukaemia (15 deaths, SMR 1.44, 95% CI 0.80 to 2.37) was observed. Mortality from myeloid leukaemia was greatest among workers first exposed in the earliest years when exposures were presumably higher, among workers with 10 or more years of exposure, and among workers with 20 or more years since first exposure. No nasal or nasopharyngeal cancers were observed. Mortality from trachea, bronchus, and lung cancer (147 deaths, SMR 0.98, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.15) was not increased. Multiple cause mortality from leukaemia was increased almost twofold among workers with both 10 or more years of exposure and 20 years or more since first exposure (15 deaths, SMR 1.92, 95% CI 1.08 to 3.17). Multiple cause mortality from myeloid leukaemia among this group of workers was also significantly increased (8 deaths, SMR 2.55, 95% CI 1.10 to 5.03). Conclusions:Results support a possible relation between formaldehyde exposure and myeloid leukaemia mortality. Previous epidemiological studies supporting a relation between formaldehyde exposure and leukaemia mortality have been primarily of formaldehyde exposed professional groups, not formaldehyde exposed industrial workers. Limitations include limited power to detect an excess for rare cancers such as nasal and nasopharyngeal cancers and lack of individual exposure estimates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Formaldehyde in the Indoor Environment
Salthammer, T., Mentese, S., & Marutzky, R. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr800399g · Cited by 1,808
The Enigmatic Epidemiology of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Chang, E. T., & Adami, H.-O. (2006) · Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention · doi:10.1158/1055-9965.epi-06-0353 · Cited by 1,297
Cogliano, V. J., Grosse, Y., Baan, R. A., Straif, K., Secretan, M. B., Ghissassi, F. E., & the Working Group for Volume 88 (2005) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.7542 · Cited by 375
Mortality from Solid Cancers among Workers in Formaldehyde Industries
Hauptmann, M., Lubin, J. H., Stewart, P. A., Hayes, R. B., & Blair, A. (2004) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwh174 · Cited by 331
Multiple myeloma: A review of the epidemiologic literature
Alexander, D. D., Mink, P. J., Adami, H.-O., Cole, P., Mandel, J. S., Oken, M. M., & Trichopoulos, D. (2007) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.22718 · Cited by 321
Metadata
- Authors
- Pinkerton, L. E., Hein, M. J., & Stayner, L. T.
- Venue
- Occupational and Environmental Medicine
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2004-02-25
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 193-200
- ISSN
- 0007-1072 (ISSN-L)
- 1351-0711
- 1470-7926
- OpenAlex
- W2066525085
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mortality among a cohort of garment workers exposed to formaldehyde: an update. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/oem.2003.007476
- The paper
- Pinkerton, L. E., Hein, M. J., & Stayner, L. T. (2004). Mortality among a cohort of garment workers exposed to formaldehyde: an update. Occupational and Environmental Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.2003.007476
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.